SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lightpath Technologies: LPTH New WDM player
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1219 50 0 LPTH
Emcee:  craig crawford Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
319 Thanks to Craig and the rest who share so much good information. Let me add a PAUL MARTIN-12/29/1997
318 Craig thanks so much for sharing your understanding of stocks. Happy Holidays Vatren Jurin-12/27/1997
317 << I am interested in knowing your opinion of why LPTHA has gone down so craig crawford-12/27/1997
316 << In your opinion, what specifically has Osicom management done? >>craig crawford-12/27/1997
315 I will have to get back to you on that. I was just typing a lengthy reply and craig crawford-12/24/1997
314 Hi Craig: I am interested in knowing your opinion of why LPTHA has gone down sVatren Jurin-12/24/1997
313 << Your closet bullishness on ANCR is safe with me >> I didn'tcraig crawford-12/24/1997
312 << It seems that only a few companies have short-haul DWDM products whichcraig crawford-12/24/1997
311 Craig C., <<ANCR might be considered a speculative buy at these levels. Craig Stevenson-12/24/1997
310 Craig, Your closet bullishness on ANCR is safe with me. I follow the SI threadAT7-12/24/1997
309 <i>Why do you talk of off subjects? Your confusing not only wa, but possiGrantcw-12/23/1997
308 Why do you talk of off subjects? Your confusing not only wa, but possibly otheflash-12/23/1997
307 believe founder of ozicom has beenconvicted of fraud!jean sutherland-12/23/1997
306 Craig, <i>Management is... well let's say... (I can't use the woGrantcw-12/23/1997
305 << However, when you discuss ignorant or criminal management please be clcraig crawford-12/23/1997
304 Craig, I find the discussion off topic very interesting and am not suggesting yAT7-12/23/1997
303 Tim, Thanks so much for the insights... Can't comment significantly on the Duane L. Olson-12/23/1997
302 << What's wrong with the company now? >> Management is... wellcraig crawford-12/23/1997
301 I just read a few of your posts Craig and agree that you were pretty much the oGrantcw-12/23/1997
300 << That may be going a little bit overboard, but I appreciate your commencraig crawford-12/23/1997
299 <i>They are a scam plain and simple</i> That may be going a littleGrantcw-12/23/1997
298 << You sure sound bitter towards Osicom. >> Actually I made a nicecraig crawford-12/23/1997
297 Craig, You sure sound bitter towards Osicom. Admittedly, its stock price hasnGrantcw-12/23/1997
296 << I was wondering what your opinion is now of Osicom and its Gigamux procraig crawford-12/23/1997
295 <i>I ruled out going long on Osicom and decided to go short.</i> CGrantcw-12/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News