SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Zeev's Turnips
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
644 39 0
Emcee:  Pink Minion Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
319Some excerpts from CJ Wells decsion, (All bold is added by me) ...at page 41: I Carl R.-12/9/2000
318Actually, I admire the judge who crossed over to the majority side, at least we SBHX-12/9/2000
317Actually no, I wasn't judging impartiality by whether or not they agree withCarl R.-12/9/2000
316Consistent with my theme that we are increasingly headed for disaster, I fear thCarl R.-12/9/2000
315Hi Carl - it appears both of us have anticipated some of each other's responBosco-12/9/2000
314Hi Carl - maybe we can agree to disagree as far as the FL SC is concerned. I cerBosco-12/9/2000
313Yes, Bosco, again my fears prove justified. The USSC just can't keep out of Carl R.-12/9/2000
312Bosco, actually my language was meant to be interpreted literally, but it is alsCarl R.-12/9/2000
311Carl, (vbg) Subtlety is lost with B&W text. I was trying my hand at humourSBHX-12/9/2000
310OK, now I have to ask one more question. When you refer to the "level of imCarl R.-12/9/2000
309Hi Carl - evidently, the USSC had a session and decided to stop the hand count. Bosco-12/9/2000
308Hi Carl - I don't know how to respond to you b/c I don't know how to intBosco-12/9/2000
307I meant the 3 who were willing to overturn Sauls no matter what. It would be a SBHX-12/9/2000
306"This I think speaks well about the level of impartiality in 3 of the sittiCarl R.-12/9/2000
305Carl, The key of the recount question is the counting function (or the rules) fSBHX-12/9/2000
304Nice post, Carl. Re <i>I frankly can't imagine any Bush supporter acorkrious-12/9/2000
303As I spent yesterday evening in my car I was able to listen to the talking headsCarl R.-12/9/2000
302Hey Buddy! Have you taken a look at PYR? finance.yahoo.com Natural gas play. The Street-12/9/2000
301Hi Carl - fwiw, there is a squeeze going on here against the FLSC. OOH, if the jBosco-12/9/2000
300Yes, Sam. And isn't that Delta case truly bizarre and unfair? Or how about tCarl R.-12/8/2000
299Well, Judge Clark's ruling did follow her utterances. The FSC has thrown somCarl R.-12/8/2000
298Bosco, <i>Btw, LOL when I saw your reference of "Lewis & Clark!&Dave B-12/8/2000
297Carl, I take it back--Sauls is technically a Democrat. According to a NYT story Sam-12/8/2000
296Hi SbH - you probably have a few more chances. Vols look pretty good, but A/Ds aBosco-12/8/2000
295<I>Hope the ruling comes in before market closes. Could be some buying oppSBHX-12/8/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News