USAT Long Distance Telecommunications | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
USAT Long Distance Telecommunications

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
397	16	0	USAT

Emcee: dentique	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
322	How do I get on the Raging Stocks board?? Thx in advance MH	M Habermann	-	2/12/1999
321	good discussion of usat and trades today, Friday, on raging bull board	jim0z0	-	2/12/1999
320	USAT is trading - it is not visible except at Level II - price range is between	jim0z0	-	2/12/1999
319	My apologies to all USAT is a filing Co. therefore a MM could file a 15c211 and	TE	-	2/12/1999
318	Here is a post I found on the ftel site concerning usat. I believe it is a re	jim0z0	-	2/11/1999
317	Me thinks a delist is more likely than trade resumption, there's a lot more	Jay Fisk	-	2/11/1999
316	good luck to all the shorts tomorrow!! My guess is it never comes back. Fraud i	trader14U	-	2/11/1999
315	My source was wrong there won't be any MM in the box on this stock ever!!!	TE	-	2/11/1999
314	I'm guessing you will be able to cover your short at a much lower price...	Mitch Aunger	-	2/11/1999
313	Keep in mind that the previously announced four for one stock split took effect	jim0z0	-	2/11/1999
312	Don't underestimate these guys, They got a BB stock to $1.3 billion. If i	Smilodon	-	2/11/1999
311	Everyone have a bid in for the open? I bid two cents. Don't know if they w	StockDung	-	2/11/1999
310	I may have the time wrong, I was under the impression the halt ended at 12:30	Smilodon	-	2/11/1999
309	Thanks I knew that was what u probably meant... but wanted to be clear.. there	Mitch Aunger	-	2/11/1999
308	Sorry, didn't mean to mislead, I know they don't have $1.3 billion. I	Smilodon	-	2/11/1999
307	I tend to agree that this valuation is probably in excess... $1.3 billion is a	Mitch Aunger	-	2/11/1999
306	Well, there are others breaking into the business... must mean it is a good ide	Mitch Aunger	-	2/11/1999
305	Jim, we are just looking at the odds, Last year, the SEC halted 17 stocks, and	Smilodon	-	2/11/1999
304	Its not the facts, its the aroma. The technology is there and perhaps somebod	Murrey Walker	-	2/11/1999
303	I think we will have a clearer view in the next few days as to whether manageme	jim0z0	-	2/11/1999
302	If this indeed is a viable concept then every Ma bell will be in this along wit	TE	-	2/11/1999
301	I don't think that the issue of the technology is the point – it seems to b	Murrey Walker	-	2/11/1999
300	If and when the stock starts trading again, as I think it probably will, the in	jim0z0	-	2/11/1999
299	I can't believe it either but it is a reliable source, so we will have to	TE	-	2/11/1999
298	Trading term MM go in the box meaning they give a two sided quote.	TE	-	2/11/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):