SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Americans 4 "No Own - No Sell"
An SI Board Since September 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
455 15 0
Emcee:  Ga Bard Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
330<i>You know the more you guys try to spin this and call everyone on the peahhaha-10/4/2001
329The only problem with Margin short selling is the issue of the property owner noGa Bard-10/4/2001
328I believe that the entire set of 1933 and 1934 rules need to be reviewed and updjoseph krinsky-10/4/2001
327People have to keep in mind this: If public pressure isn't applied, then notjoseph krinsky-10/4/2001
326Transparency is exactly what will put a stop to the abuses and manipulation. FiGa Bard-10/4/2001
325It's laudable to apply public pressure ...yard_man-10/4/2001
324You may be right, but I think it's harder to justify not doing it now that ijoseph krinsky-10/4/2001
323They'll never show us daily short interest or segregate it by retail and othyard_man-10/4/2001
322<b>10 Red Flags for MMM (Market Maker Manipulation)</b> I have obseGa Bard-10/4/2001
321The thing about all of that is, it's all done by computer now. It's no ejoseph krinsky-10/4/2001
320Yep and you find that purely acceptable I guess. Someone does not understand thGa Bard-10/4/2001
319HUH ... You know the more you guys try to spin this and call everyone on the petGa Bard-10/4/2001
318AgreedPerry Ganz-10/4/2001
317<<I would like to know if the bears/shorts would be against showing short patron_anejo_por_favor-10/4/2001
316Shining example of the honest public and the evil doing brokers: October 3, 200ahhaha-10/4/2001
315<i>I would prefer doing away with the following: 1. any tick rule</i>ahhaha-10/4/2001
314<b>“Painting the Tape” Evolves to “Rolling The Tape”</b> In a Bull Ga Bard-10/4/2001
313<b>Let us hold your 144 cert for safekeeping!</b> Event 1/22/2001 Ga Bard-10/4/2001
312Some charges the SEC makes against MMs and brokers but they need to go after theGa Bard-10/4/2001
311This is what I am talking about: <i>NASD Regulation Bars John Fiero, ExpeGa Bard-10/4/2001
310I would not have a problem with an uptick ... But you want the real truth ... I Ga Bard-10/4/2001
309Yep but they will try to drag the legal concept and application into it. But thGa Bard-10/4/2001
308The If you don;t sign it you can trade huh ... I see that does not seem fair to Ga Bard-10/4/2001
307My My My ... testy aren't we. So you say that in a cash account that your sGa Bard-10/4/2001
306I agree that a broker is not suppose to short a cash account however to make an Ga Bard-10/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):