SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IFLY - travel sales on the web pure play
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4761 16 0 IFLY
Emcee:  Peter R Smith Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3336 We hear from another sucker that is immune to the facts--talk about braindead.LTK007-1/2/1999
3335 <<<Do your DD first, what a joke,Pluvia says" Buy PCCC @ 25 on 12Pluvia-1/2/1999
3334 To Auric, Simarx and M.R: Hey, I'm just an average Silicon Investor doing Robert Rose-1/2/1999
3333 If you're going to insult my research, point out something specific other tSergio H-1/2/1999
3332 Blankmind, IFLY charges normal Fedex charges. There business model allows tsimarx-1/2/1999
3331 Blankmind, what happened? You were such a staunch supporter of IFLY, but now I T-Lo Greens-1/2/1999
3330 You are drowning in your own lies Auric, this is what you said: "First Losimarx-1/2/1999
3329 That's exactly the point of all the manipulation and touting:"Auric, dSir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3328 You still haven't answered my question? Do your DD: Why is it not in Firssimarx-1/2/1999
3327 Here is that BW article on the Mob on Wall Street: businessweek.com You must reTummus1-1/2/1999
3326 Running out of debate tactics Commrad? Nth time: Not short (yet). No, your postSir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3325 You are making me look like nostradamus keep uo the good work. The righteous pLoukas-1/2/1999
3324 Auric, do your DD and tell me why it is NOT in First Londons interest to call tsimarx-1/2/1999
3323 I am going off line now to give my attention now to football:) but I leave witLTK007-1/2/1999
3322 Wrong again Commrad:"I don't like First London either as an underwriteSir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3321 You post Like an unethical short. Trashing people but unable to substantiate ysimarx-1/2/1999
3320Sir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3319 Look Socialist, I've very directly said management are crims. Shame on you Sir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3318 You imply manipulation by naked shorts, or are you not keeping up with your ownsimarx-1/2/1999
3317 Auric you sound just like that opinion article, too much of a coward to just gosimarx-1/2/1999
3316 Ah, single digit midget drill bits, every one of them First London names. Gee, Sir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3315 <i>. I also think the demand on the warrants Monday will squeeze that $6 Arcane Lore-1/2/1999
3314 A little fast on the posting, are you not?:"You are wrong Auric, the more Sir Auric Goldfinger-1/2/1999
3313 MAX, there backgrounds are solid. Who the underwriter is, doesn't matter asimarx-1/2/1999
3312 These are the only previous IPOs from First London that I can confirm are stilLTK007-1/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News