SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Spectrian Co. (SPCT)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
738 17 0 SPCT
Emcee:  Joshua Yoon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
338 Hi Dwight. I've been around, just keeping a low profile. You remember I mClint E.-10/3/1997
337 Leo, Not to question your hearing, but what is the source of the $0.70? If thRichard Tuck-10/3/1997
336 Leo, I sold this morning at 54, saw it went down to 46, bought back at 49. So, Sonny Blue-10/3/1997
335 I'm hearing 7.0 million, or .70 per share for the Q. If so, we go back to Leo Francis-10/3/1997
334 Could of made some good profit daytrading this sucker the last two days. After eddy-10/3/1997
333 Temptation too great. Bought some today at $49 1/4, near the close. Just got cLeo Francis-10/3/1997
332 SPCT's stock action today is like one of those roller coasters that swings Richard Tuck-10/3/1997
331 Leo, Good to have you back. I also was troubled by the just meeting estimatesRichard Tuck-10/3/1997
330 P.T., Sometimes, a company can deny rumors until it's blue in the face (i.Richard Tuck-10/3/1997
329 All, sorry I'm just getting back, but I've been travelling extensively.Leo Francis-10/3/1997
328 "At this time, based on the best information currently available, we are cP.T.Burnem-10/3/1997
327 Nonetheless, it looks like SPCT is about to retest its yesterday's low of P.T.Burnem-10/3/1997
326 What is going on with SPCT now it's down more than 2 pts? It is taking my PJOHN CHEN-10/3/1997
325 Looks like something is up again. The stock has gone negative for the day. MuRichard Tuck-10/3/1997
324 Dwight, I agree with some of what you say, but I disagree with the characterizRichard Tuck-10/3/1997
323 *off topic* Hi Clint - What have you been up to? I saw you took a vacation fromDwight E. Karlsen-10/3/1997
322 I somewhat agree with you at this stage, Dwight. I would take profit at 55 thisClint E.-10/3/1997
321 My understanding is that the PWAV order was for base station devices which SPCTCarl R.-10/3/1997
320 Ask 54 @9:32AM. Volume =204,200. Wow!Sonny Blue-10/3/1997
319 Richard: excellent post. Echos my thoughts almost exactly, especially the CYMI ftth-10/3/1997
318 Peter: Was looking for magic words "MORGAN "..... Now I understand thftth-10/3/1997
317 Philosophical comments: I've been watching this stock for the last couple mDwight E. Karlsen-10/3/1997
316 Krab, These are precisely my concerns. Why must we be in the dark while the iRichard Tuck-10/3/1997
315 Thanks for your help. I use Fidelity because they have some features I really lkahunabear-10/3/1997
314 Stock was halted at 3:17, Bid/Ask at that time was 45.125 by 45.25 according toKris-10/2/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News