SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums
Questions and Answers with SI Admin (s)
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4895 271 0
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3395He didn't need to ask you...he knew why you did it....jlallen49/29/2009
3394That seems reasonable. His representation suggested a refusal on SI's part tone_less-9/29/2009
3393He never asked me. I don't feel particularly compelled to reach out to useSI Dave89/28/2009
3392>>><b>"I have no idea. SI would not tell me why I was in jaione_less-9/28/2009
3391I thought that you were going to be gone from here because of the sale of the siDigrdug-9/18/2009
3390I'm not going to be doing much if any coding here anymore. I'll comment SI Dave-9/17/2009
3389Bob/Dave: Have you ever considered putting a read / hit counter on posts? I thinkidl19/17/2009
3388There must be a link to that post elsewhere. Those recommendations occurred on: SI Dave-9/12/2009
3387Also interesting that that post has 3 Recommendations...years before that featurHenry J Costanzo-9/12/2009
3386This is the post with the oldest date: Message 3213 First post on the ISDN boaSI Dave-9/12/2009
3385You see this? SI's old home page: web.archive.orgCheeky Kid19/11/2009
3384I'm on Facebook since last September, mostly playing Mob Wars, but I can'Cheeky Kid-9/11/2009
3383Need some Ra Ra here to get it going again. Facebook and twitter seem to be doiDigrdug-9/11/2009
3382Thanks, I knew they were somewhere. I miss the old days, still have some screenCheeky Kid-9/11/2009
3381According to a post from Josef Svejk, this post dated 8/21/1995 may be the oldesArcane Lore-9/11/2009
3380I think the numbering system may be different back then. I was trying all diffeCheeky Kid-9/11/2009
3379By going up to the address and manually changing the 3 to a 1 I got "no sucDigrdug-9/11/2009
3378Dave do you have a link to the first post on SI? I put a 3 in and got this MessCheeky Kid-9/11/2009
3377here he is again, today, boosting yet again, his ad revs and his web counts. MeBox-By-The-Riviera™29/3/2009
3376Message 25916586 so, can we partner with SI? under the above arrangement? andBox-By-The-Riviera™-9/3/2009
3375Message 25916554Box-By-The-Riviera™-9/3/2009
3374could you tell us all, why it is, mike shedlock can promote his commercial web sBox-By-The-Riviera™159/3/2009
3373I have given up on Firefox as well how well does safari work? I'm back to usjason12345-8/20/2009
3372When did the number of characters allowed in user names drop from 30 to 20? AboSIer formerly known as Joe B.-8/19/2009
3371The Search This Subject function is again working well. I find it very useful. Fjrhana-8/13/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):