SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Zeev's Turnips
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
644 39 0
Emcee:  Pink Minion Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
344Hi Carl - 1st thing 1st. If I ve inadvertently insulted you, <i> and sorrBosco-12/11/2000
343At one point early in the election I was listening to Limbaugh (I rarely listen Carl R.-12/11/2000
342Gov Bush is the leader of the GOP. The commander in chief must show leadership &Bosco-12/11/2000
341Bush, et al is not saying this. It is all about BS though....The Street-12/11/2000
340Hi TS - Butterfly ballot has had its problem even in 1996. Only that the margin Bosco-12/11/2000
339Zeev-- you going to look at PYR for me? I would appreciate a quick overview...The Street-12/11/2000
3381996? Lost me on that-- but I do indeed agree with your post. But, what irks mThe Street-12/11/2000
337Hi TS - thx for the article. Actually, it is not true. The issue was dated back Bosco-12/11/2000
336I think the butterfly ballot was a red herring: reagan.comThe Street-12/11/2000
335Hi Carl - I hope you don't take what I am going to say personal, for it is nBosco-12/11/2000
334I agree that so far the ones attacking the court system are the Republicans. On Carl R.-12/10/2000
333Hi Dave - yes, I ve heard Sen Danforth [quite a standup guy in my book] has alreBosco-12/10/2000
332Hi Carl - thanks for the elaboration. Seriously, I ve no intention to put you onBosco-12/10/2000
331Carl, you got to admit, so far any of the sides attacking any courts, and some oZeev Hed-12/10/2000
330OK, Bosco, so you want to put me on the defensive. LOL OK, I'll defend myselCarl R.-12/10/2000
329Bosco, <i>The reputation of both Bush and the court could suffer further Dave B-12/10/2000
328Hi Carl & all - ok, I ve to admit, I am totally confused now! From the same Bosco-12/10/2000
327Hi Carl - it appears this fellow may win some points in your book. From LA TimesBosco-12/10/2000
326Carl, I'm basically drawing conclusions out of thin air. These FSC judgesSBHX-12/10/2000
325I agree with, you particularly in view of Scalia bringing up as an argument thatZeev Hed-12/10/2000
324Zeev, allow me to add that the rationale for affirming Saul at the FSC level is Carl R.-12/10/2000
323Hi Carl - I enjoy discussion based on reasoning also; however, I ve never enjoyeBosco-12/10/2000
322I agree, Zeev. As I have said I am not at all clear what precedents exist in thoCarl R.-12/10/2000
321Carl, it will be interesting to see if Wells will apply the same principles of &Zeev Hed-12/10/2000
320I agree with you to a certain extent that it is important that people do what thCarl R.-12/9/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News