SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GALTECH SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS CORP. (GTSM)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
394 4 0 GTSM
Emcee:  MARK F. POYANT Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
344GTSM is a scam. It is my experience that online posters that respond to points Mahatmabenfoo-6/13/2002
343MEN OF ACTION! Mr. GammaR wrote: "actions speak louder than words and WortMahatmabenfoo-6/13/2002
342Another scam stock I looked at years ago was GNNX. Kind of played out like GTSMflippity-flop-6/13/2002
341These guys are real dead beats. Almost as bad as Bruce Lewis at Global Tracker flippity-flop-6/13/2002
340When have I called you names?? Please give some examples. When you attack gGalgammaray-6/13/2002
339GTSM got a "loan" and gave shares for it. But it'll never pay bacMahatmabenfoo-6/12/2002
338--- Personal attack? You clearly attacked Galtech's --- credibility by claiMahatmabenfoo-6/12/2002
337Personal attack? You clearly attacked Galtech's credibility by claiming thatgammaray-6/12/2002
336as usual Gamma, you use personal attacks to try to deflect from this company'Mahatmabenfoo-6/12/2002
335Last I heard from you, you were trying to convince me that Galtech could not havgammaray-6/12/2002
334Flow of information? Got some small-time stock traders wannabes generating thouflippity-flop-6/12/2002
333Hey, Gamma! Norm, your source and mentor (and alter-ego!) has the best explanatMahatmabenfoo-6/12/2002
332That's really funny. Jim quote a HUGE chunk of plain language from the SEC Mahatmabenfoo-6/12/2002
331I just want to make sure flip flop got my message. It seems that the ignore featgammaray-6/12/2002
330They tell me that you are known as fatkat on raging bull. I understand that you gammaray-6/12/2002
329Answers these questions. Once these questions are answered, we can discuss the flippity-flop-6/9/2002
328Is that your way of saying thank you for explaining that revenue does not includgammaray-5/23/2002
327Since you are Norm's handmaiden now, let's see how the conversation direMahatmabenfoo-5/23/2002
326I am sorry. I did not understand what you meant in your statement below when yougammaray-5/17/2002
325"That's right and they did receive it prior to 3-31-02. You are stretchMahatmabenfoo-5/17/2002
324Apparently as discussed in the past you pay no attention to financial statementsgammaray-5/17/2002
323"vendetta"? another of those personal pumper type comments. $358 isMahatmabenfoo-5/17/2002
322What in the world are you talking about. I understand that you have some sort ofgammaray-5/17/2002
321---Galtech is showing progress and that seems to bother you nope. First: itMahatmabenfoo-5/17/2002
320FROM THE 10Q On March 15, 2002 , the Company entered into a debt agreement Mahatmabenfoo-5/17/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News