SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3441Of course they will.Vendit™-11/26/2000
3440The Supreme Court decision will be final...unfortunately it will only be final wTraderGreg-11/26/2000
3439That crazed man probably would!Carolyn-11/26/2000
3438Gore and team wouldn't challenge the Supreme Court...would they?KLP-11/26/2000
3437Even bigger <G>... . . .hadn't noticed it was a grub...wonder if whippKLP-11/26/2000
3436<vbg>Carolyn-11/26/2000
3435<b>Guide to the Florida Election Controversy</b> <b>What happVendit™-11/26/2000
3434Go ahead, whippersnapper....I can see you pawing the ground to do so.... Edit...KLP-11/26/2000
3433Do you believe that you have to die or lose a body part to be patriotic? AbrahaTraderGreg-11/26/2000
3432My prediction stands that the Clinton/Gore Nazis will manufacture enough votes tCYBERKEN-11/26/2000
3431Does anyone have a link to a site that summarizes the status of ALL pending litiTraderGreg-11/26/2000
3430This from this mornings news. WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. –– Weary Palm Beach County Vendit™-11/26/2000
3429Your points are all noted. However, notwithstanding those excellent comments, ITraderGreg-11/26/2000
3428You know, I said this before. I am sick of Republicans claiming some sort of moTraderGreg-11/26/2000
3427<b>Upcoming Supreme Court Hearing Focuses Upon Untested Law </b> AVendit™-11/26/2000
3426A couple of points here: 1- It is FL law that Ms Harris has the sole authority Vendit™-11/26/2000
3425Hi KLP, <i>How's this...The XploRe language is ,,,,,Nicholas HengartRaymond Duray-11/26/2000
3424Re: <i>Politics is very grand.</i> Breyer's also makes a GrandRaymond Duray-11/26/2000
3423sandintoes You're just a barrel of laughs this evening. Lott, Armey, Newtjttmab-11/26/2000
3422Sort of reminds me of the fellow named Sir, who lived next door to a know-it-allKLP-11/26/2000
3421Ahhhhhhhhhhhh Raymond.....been a tough day, eh? Well, guess that makes you feKLP-11/26/2000
3420Awrite, awrite, <b>awrite.</b> There's too many people expectinWalkingshadow-11/26/2000
3419Politics is very grand. WSWalkingshadow-11/26/2000
3418I used to disagree with a friend of mine who said that the Repulicans were a bunjttmab-11/26/2000
3417Clearly sir, You do understand the dissembling of the GOP's thrust before Raymond Duray-11/26/2000
3416"A lot of people without any brains talk a lot, don't they?" moosebeary-11/26/2000
3415"Well, if she does it with that high school cheerleader smirk, she might fiCYBERKEN-11/26/2000
3414Surely you jest, Ray. "Either side of the present conflict" should haKLP-11/26/2000
3413Hi KLP, Would it trouble you if I suggest that the passage of Thomas Paine thaRaymond Duray-11/26/2000
3412Re: <i>Anecdotal observation but grease my palms and I will do the study&lRaymond Duray-11/26/2000
3411<i>Politics is grand. </i> I'm disappointed, after all the Raymond Duray-11/25/2000
3410<b>Thomas Paine (1737-1809)</b> These are the times that try menKLP-11/25/2000
3409<i>Two Germanys would be better, TEN or more would be preferred.</i>Raymond Duray-11/25/2000
3408This has never ever been about electing Bush as much as it has been about bootinTraderGreg-11/25/2000
3407Greg, I'm not a betting man. If I were, I'd have made a small fortune Raymond Duray-11/25/2000
3406<i><< Please explain. I'm clueless about this. >></i&gWalkingshadow-11/25/2000
3405<<PS: CB, defend assault and battery on the 19th Floor of the County BuildTraderGreg-11/25/2000
3404latimes.com Justices Dust Off an 1887 Statute for Ballot Battle By DAVID G. Ssandintoes-11/25/2000
3403By the same token, a Bush victory is clearly legitimized by the SC if the decisiTraderGreg-11/25/2000
3402Herr Wokken, <i>It didn't say in the story, but did the recounts conRaymond Duray-11/25/2000
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News