SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ACRT about to move to new highs
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7054 12 0 ACRT
Emcee:  Lance Viscioni Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3479 Dear Davef: Could you comment about the 144 filing by an entity located at theMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3478 Excellent work, Mr. Frost. John Chew's employer, Ponte Verde sold stock asMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3477 Repost, Yahoo concerning 144's: The issue here is that you insinuate that Goulds-3/16/1998
3476 Just a suggestion: several of the guys at Yahoo are going to maintain radio silSteve Schreiber-3/16/1998
3475 Mr. Pink delivers the sad message in a humorous fashion but the reality behind Mr. Pink-3/16/1998
3474 Mr. Pink likes your style, not your investment style, but your writing style. Mr. Pink-3/16/1998
3473 Dan: Your obviously not reading Davef's posts. You see, you are nothing mDoo-3/16/1998
3472 Ah, Mr Pink. I detect a note of discord. Perhaps the camel effluvium still irristan s.-3/16/1998
3471 Alexander C. "Stinky" Stonkus, the COO/CFO has some serious legal prMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3470 don/pinky.. Don't assume, get answers.. as you suggest. They aren't necGoulds-3/16/1998
3469 Jim - I agree with you that << 144 sales should have no effect on a compaDan Packer-3/16/1998
3468 RR - the intelligent investor would not "invest" in ACRT at a price gDan Packer-3/16/1998
3467 pink , who is Stinky Stonkus? Someone you met while peering up the camel's Goulds-3/16/1998
3466 pink, I quit taking you seriously when I started checking your sources. Lies doGoulds-3/16/1998
3465 Dan... First, 144 sales should have no effect on a company's income statembananawind-3/16/1998
3464 An intelligent investor would simply ask the question, what are all the filingsRandall Rosen-3/16/1998
3463 Pinkie, how would you know this today? Insider info perhaps? Or are you just goRandall Rosen-3/16/1998
3462 But, you are are joking, right? All these posts referring to accounting practicRandall Rosen-3/16/1998
3461 If they threw in stock as a sweetener for some TAD deal, would it be capitalizeDan Packer-3/16/1998
3460 Dang, stan s. You sure did get hooked on this thread. And really stooping dowDoo-3/16/1998
3459 Tomorrow shall be an ugly day for Stinky Stonkus. Mr. PinkMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3458 Stan, Mr. Pink will kick your ass any day of the week in terms of funds under mMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3457 Mr. Pink is of the opinion that even the Grim Reaper of financial shenanigans cMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3456 STONKUS HAS PROBLEMS Mr. PinkMr. Pink-3/16/1998
3455 Yo, Dan! What are you talking about? Why would a sale of stock be charged againRandall Rosen-3/16/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):