SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Critical Investing Workshop
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
35685 103 0
Emcee:  Uncle Frank Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
34985There are quite of few different logical reasons, in both the bull and bear campDalin-3/22/2001
34984Jambo, I posted a VIX chart earlier today: geocities.com As for the market, waAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34983Poet, the VIX got up to just over 60 in '98. In '87, I seem to recall rejambo-bwana-3/22/2001
34982Yes, I've heard that DRAM inventories have been mysteriously declining latelSam Citron-3/22/2001
34981That's not a naive question at all. A lot of people think it's a combinPoet-3/22/2001
34980Naive question: Why has SOX been so strong today while everything else weak acroSam Citron-3/22/2001
34979Boy it gets scary when we rub up against resistance. I had my finger over the bPoet-3/22/2001
34978Breakout's looking PD good about now. Still skeptical enough to just watch. AllansAlias-3/22/2001
34977Yea, SOX could not break through. Lunch time breakouts are so rare. Anyway, it mAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34976Hmmm, we're right up against it, both on the COMPX and SOX. EDIT: Failure.Poet-3/22/2001
34975Here comes that NDX test in 1637 area... SOX will need to break downtrend line AllansAlias-3/22/2001
34974Here's Allan's COMPX chart, updated on March 14th: geocities.com ItPoet-3/22/2001
34973It may not make it high enough for the test, so I'll also be looking for a bAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34972Thank you for he explanation. I wasn't sure what you meant in your last posPoet-3/22/2001
34971From an Elliott perspective, I am tracking the NASDAQ as an a-b-c-d-e correctionAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34970FWIW, Hahn agrees with you on the SOX: <I> The really bad sign for the maPoet-3/22/2001
34969NDX bounced off the bottom of its gently falling wedge it has built since yesterAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34968VIX last at 60 in 1998 I believe. Will verify later...AllansAlias-3/22/2001
34967VIX=60 was October 1987 crash level , wasn't it? Hoping for a wee bounce hePoet-3/22/2001
34966Wake me up when VIX prints 60. -ngAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34965Duly bookmarked! Thanks Allan. VIX over 40, I see.Poet-3/22/2001
34964COMPX keeps making new lows here and I think the NDX-100 coil could break to theAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34963Allan, I don't disagree. I would need to see a turn in the NDX and some stajambo-bwana-3/22/2001
34962I would not go long the NASDAQ here with your money. -g On another topic, peoplAllansAlias-3/22/2001
34961Wanting to go long during a period where non-tech is a world of hurt is just gamAllansAlias-3/22/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News