SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
KEMET Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
906 12 0 KEME
Emcee:  techtonicbull Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
356techtonicbull, the only thing that strikes me about 31.5 is the recent bounce ofTechplayer-7/28/2000
355<Great quarter and investors buy insurance stocks today> Well Jack, that BWAC-7/27/2000
354This is a good article. Tends to sound like all the rest of them though with a ptechtonicbull-7/27/2000
353Vishay Intertech Off 8%; CFO Says Can't Explain Dow Jones Newswires July 27,Jack Hartmann-7/27/2000
352interesting comments...towards the bottom... Thursday July 27, 20000 --------Techplayer-7/27/2000
351Frustration is setting in here! But frustration is only one part of the investiSJS-7/27/2000
350M. Happel, OT: And....you can't go wrong taking a profit. Sell 1/2 your poPaul Senior-7/27/2000
349<i>investing shibboleths. </i> WOW! Is that what I am?<g> The Ox-7/27/2000
348M. Mayhem. ot: Okay. You may be right. I'll chill. It's just that I likPaul Senior-7/27/2000
347I think your future eps numbers are a little too aggressive but it would be niceThe Ox-7/27/2000
346Hello Techtonicbull! Just want to say how much I have enjoyed following this thMolly Mayhem-7/27/2000
345What's up? I read nothing "offensive" in Michael's postings, Molly Mayhem-7/27/2000
344Molly: the only thing you can do is invest for the long term. I have found that techtonicbull-7/27/2000
343-g-. OT. Okay, M. Happel. So what I read as a blanket statement "Don'tPaul Senior-7/27/2000
342You are right that this is probably not the bottom here. However, if I like a sttechtonicbull-7/27/2000
341Be careful. I am not advising any investment in any security.techtonicbull-7/27/2000
340Agree with your posts Michael Happel. Averaging up is an alternative to averagiMolly Mayhem-7/27/2000
339OT: <i>Who can those people be who can afford to lose?</i> Anyone wThe Ox-7/27/2000
338I'm w/you Tech. Adding a little more today. Never did understand about &quPaul Senior-7/27/2000
337<i>Are you in the financial services industry? </i> No, just an indThe Ox-7/27/2000
336Good point about investing only what you can afford to lose. I do not see the patechtonicbull-7/27/2000
335Here we go again. This is designed to shake out the weak players in favor of thetechtonicbull-7/27/2000
334Major perception issues surrounding the industry and with the market's weakThe Ox-7/27/2000
333Very late opening.....Indicated 23-26......SJS-7/27/2000
332I don't believe that double ordering is a factor because with demand being stechtonicbull-7/27/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):