SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
OILEX (OLEX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4276 3 0 OLEX
Emcee:  Eric Maggard Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3576 I don't know. Steve-6/22/1998
3575 All you have to do is call the company at 713-629-5998 to confirm that negotiatSteve-6/22/1998
3574 Steve, how many shares does Mr. Burditt currently own? Offie (eom)OFW-6/22/1998
3573 <Wrong. Negotiations continue> PROVE IT! Offie (eom)OFW-6/22/1998
3572 It has nothing to do with Market Pathways a PR/IR firm recently retained by TitSteve-6/22/1998
3571 Wrong. Negotiations continue. Steve-6/22/1998
3570 Steve I've seen other people ask you this question but I don't recalzonkie-6/22/1998
3569 Interesting article Thursday June 18, 9:59 pm Eastern Time Hard times for smalDitchdigger-6/22/1998
3568 " Additionally the boards of OLEX and CAYC have continued negotiations on Ditchdigger-6/22/1998
3567 Considering the recent misrepresentation of Oilex on this board...I repost the Steve-6/22/1998
3566 >>250-300, not bad. It was at this rate (OK, 150-300) two years ago (accSteve-6/22/1998
3565 Steve, At Oilex's rate, you're right. It will be hard to find evidence Marty Rubin-6/21/1998
3564 Are/were these presplit 144 issued shares, effectively split adjusted for the 1Ditchdigger-6/21/1998
3563 So many questions, so little time! You know, DD, one of the biggest questions OFW-6/21/1998
3562 Offie,apparently Steve is not going to admit,that there is no obvious reason whDitchdigger-6/21/1998
3561 <The requirements of doing the deal> What requirements are you speaking OFW-6/21/1998
3560 The requirements of doing the deal. Duh! Steve-6/21/1998
3559 <The reasons clearly have to do with the proposed consolidation of operationOFW-6/21/1998
3558 It is clear that your intent is to try to bury the good news at Oilex. It won&Steve-6/21/1998
3557 This is a substantial misrepresentation of the reasons why filings have been deSteve-6/21/1998
3556 What isn't a misrepresentation,is the fact that this company has failed to Ditchdigger-6/21/1998
3555 Considering the recent misrepresentation of Oilex on this board...I repost the Steve-6/21/1998
3554 SteveT, In order to bet on a rise, you have to think of someone who will push tMarty Rubin-6/19/1998
3553 Thanks Offie, that was good reading (Oil-X posts 2110-2113). Man he got off easzonkie-6/19/1998
3552 Stress is not good for you, Steve. Try to relax! Offie (eom) OFW-6/19/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News