SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Grammar and Spelling Lab
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4713 68 0
Emcee:  jbe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3586 I haven't been here in ages, and a lot of work I'm getting done, too-- E-3/3/2000
3585 in the process of trying to organize my bookmarks, i stumbled across a site i wBiggie Smalls-3/3/2000
3584 Somebody pointed me to this site, which I found quite pleasant. Don't knowThe Philosopher-2/23/2000
3583 Thank-you, Joan, for your warm welcome. On the whole, I agree with you that &#Achilles-2/14/2000
3582 Achilles, how nice to see you back! Hope it is for longer than the few secondsjbe-2/14/2000
3581 Funny - I rather doubt that Edwarda looks much like a renegade Republican. jbe-2/14/2000
3580 ROFL, dear George! Piffle withdrawn posthaste. Deeply abject apologies. Edwarda-2/14/2000
3579 PIFFLE PISSES ME OFF!!! Please, dear lady, do not ever piffle me. I would appGeorge S. Montgomery12/14/2000
3578 My dear George, I should be very happy to see you withdraw the mugwump accusatiEdwarda-2/14/2000
3577 Dear Sniff: If I have been cruel, I did not intend it to be inappropriately crGeorge S. Montgomery-2/14/2000
3576 Oh, George, how can you be so cruel toward me? It's Valentine's Day! Edwarda-2/14/2000
3575 EdA: You are a blatant mugwump, equivocating beyond even the loosest standardsGeorge S. Montgomery-2/14/2000
3574 I did not say that I <i>agree</i> with the assumption, George. ActEdwarda-2/14/2000
3573 Dear Ach! The may doesn't bother me too much. It gives me a pleasant subjGeorge S. Montgomery-2/14/2000
3572 Dear EdA: Cannot accept 'underlying assumption.' Sometimes a little oGeorge S. Montgomery-2/14/2000
3571 >"A person whose views are inappropriately offensive may >still makAchilles-2/14/2000
3570 George, your point is well taken. However, I think that the underlying assumptEdwarda-2/14/2000
3569 Will, or can, anyone tell me why this is not ok: "A person whose views arGeorge S. Montgomery-2/14/2000
3568 Well, take care, and if I do not hear from you in a couple, I will e- mail my cNeocon-2/11/2000
3567 I'll be going out this afternoon. However, if I suddenly disappear during Edwarda-2/11/2000
3566 I am sorry to hear that. Anyway, I was just checking on you, and noticed the quNeocon-2/11/2000
3565 Right now I am suffering so many bizarre problems with my own system that I'Edwarda-2/11/2000
3564 It appears that I do not have the width in the printer to accept the image. AnyNeocon-2/11/2000
3563 What's the problem? Edwarda-2/10/2000
3562 I made it on the first try, but in light of all the grammar training I've hEdwarda-2/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):