SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MERQ - Mercury Interactive
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
512 33 0 MERQ
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
362 John, Yes. Based on ML's price target of $78 and MERQ's closing price oBob Kim-10/3/1999
361 What is ML ?top 10 analysis (updated through 10/1) Are we talking about upsidJohn McDonald-10/3/1999
360 MERQ now included in ML top 10 analysis (updated through 10/1) MERQ is ranked Bob Kim-10/2/1999
359 MERQ A "CORE 2,000 HOLDING" Axxel Knutson, Director of InstitutionalAxxel-9/30/1999
358 More active, but almost all spam shit. I go there only o/o desperation. jayjay silberman-9/7/1999
357 Nah, I'm noticing, but I'm also noticing that SI is dead, business modeTrader Dave-9/7/1999
356 pretty blase group, considering this thing was at 21 in mid-april. Sure is a njay silberman-9/4/1999
355 Here's Topaz: investors.com Mercury Interactive Sees Topaz As Ticket To Ejay silberman-8/4/1999
354 Wiz, BD and I have been involved with MERQ since 1997..... It will be interesTrader Dave-7/25/1999
353 Anyone around to talk about MERQ being a key system management company for web-Wizard-7/23/1999
352 Earnings Announcement: biz.yahoo.com ----------------------------------------Nevin S.-4/15/1999
351Message 8767346Trader Dave-4/7/1999
350 Yes - MERQ is a major holding and their prospects have never been brighter. ThBulldozer-3/4/1999
349 Bulldozer: Friend said, "MERQ subject of discussion on MLPF&S conf.caDon S.Boller-3/4/1999
348 Well since this thread is rather dead in the face of Merq's dramatic comebaBulldozer-11/13/1998
347 I've known this company for years. They have been extremely consistant inAndrew Abrams-10/14/1998
346 30% is NOT viable for merq going forward. probably more like 50%. y2k is aroTrader Dave-10/6/1998
345 Lots of damage the past 2 days, down 15 (38%) from 39. I assume more of the samDave O.-10/6/1998
344 good questions an observations. It's nice to see some activity on the threTrader Dave-8/18/1998
343 Here's another one: informationweek.com./696/96iuaut.htm How does this afgrowthvalue-8/17/1998
342 Thanks! (EOM)growthvalue-8/10/1998
341 Wait I'm confused also - can you go through all that again? <b>:)<Bulldozer-8/7/1998
340 OK OK, merq tools are integrated with many off the shelf software vendors incTrader Dave-8/7/1998
339 Honestly, I'm having trouble understanding the difference. If MERQ tests sgrowthvalue-8/7/1998
338 good question! but it's not a threat to merq, but it looks that way. peregTrader Dave-8/7/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News