MERQ - Mercury Interactive | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
MERQ - Mercury Interactive

An SI Board Since April 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
512	33	0	MERQ

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Any news forcing their 5+ point drop today? They've gone from ~22
to ~13 in 2 days. I heard that a couple analysts down-graded their
status (plus the SF Chronicle had a section listing 94 vs 95 income
for hitech companies - I think Mercury's *dropped* 200% from 94
to 95.) Anyone know details?

Brett

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
512	nytimes.com	techanalyst1	-	7/1/2002
511	SCREAMERS Mercury shares surge after Q1 results Strong profit bucks trend of	MGV	-	4/13/2002
510	MERCURY INTERACTIVE [MERQ] BUY $29.44 MC:$2.6B Deutsche Banc Alex Brown § M	MGV	-	4/12/2002
509	Regarding SEBL, Landan made two particularly relevant comments, one (+), one pot	MGV	-	4/11/2002
508	Oh... they didn't learn from the last quarter when that other broker thought	techanalyst1	-	4/11/2002
507	Would have been difficult to know they were as strong as they were. We knew the	MGV	-	4/11/2002
506	Cuz I'm not a gambler. I should have known they were fine though. TA	techanalyst1	-	4/11/2002
505	Cause you're not greedy?	MGV	-	4/11/2002
504	Why oh why oh why didn't I buy April calls on the close? I should know bett	techanalyst1	-	4/11/2002
503	Strong, strong, strong quarter after hearing all of the gloom and doom the past	MGV	-	4/11/2002
502	Looking more like maybe my aggressive estimates for 03 are possible, eh? They wo	techanalyst1	-	4/11/2002
501	About to hear the call but the results appear to be strong. Message 17319432	MGV	-	4/11/2002
500	I like it here and would like it more/again at $28.	MGV	-	4/3/2002
499	That's ok, as long as this doesn't keep happening every quarter, that pr	techanalyst1	-	4/3/2002
498	This morning Goldman cuts '02 numbers on infrastructure names including MERQ	MGV	-	4/3/2002
497	If you email IR at Merq you'll probably get more accurate answers than from	techanalyst1	-	3/25/2002
496	FWIW another opinion on MERQ: new.globes.co.il	MGV	-	3/24/2002
495	Thanks again for your good summary. Just a couple clarifications. I'm stil	MGV	-	3/24/2002
494	As of Dec. 2001, they did approx. 34% service vs. 66% license revenues. I think	techanalyst1	-	3/24/2002
493	Thanks for your view. W/r/t the repeat revenue model - what % of revs is from m	MGV	-	3/24/2002
492	Hmmm.... how likely? In April? Well... I've owned merq for several years and	techanalyst1	-	3/24/2002
491	Its a good company but it looks expensive here. I'm willing to pay for the	MGV	-	3/24/2002
490	Think Soundview got it right this time? From Briefing.com Market Report -- Sho	techanalyst1	-	3/22/2002
489	It's been a must have for years. Not sure why no one ever posts on this boar	techanalyst1	-	1/29/2002
488	Robertson Stephens UPS its rating to a BUY this morning. In this tech environmen	cyberman	-	1/29/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):