SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PairGain Technologies
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
36349 70 0 PAIR
Emcee:  victoria castello Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
36249 You didn't apologize? Hmmm. Well, you should. We'll all be out of PAJim S-4/19/2000
36248 I didn't apologize. I'm only sorry that you feel the thread agrees withDavid Nelson-4/19/2000
36247 Your apology is a bit lacking in conviction, but I'll accept it anyway. ThJim S-4/19/2000
36246 I hope ADCT can do something. Pair management fumbled it for years. There are lDavid Nelson-4/19/2000
36245 No wishful thinking will not make PAIR move. But ADCT will and did. A little laBWAC-4/19/2000
36244 I guess the truth is hard to take. I hope the newbies around here take a secondDavid Nelson-4/19/2000
36243 Gosh, golly gee, Dave, thanks! It is SOOOO rare that we get a visit from someoJim S-4/19/2000
36242 Every once in a while I stop by and read a few posts to remind myself why I soDavid Nelson-4/19/2000
36241 David, Yes, it was interesting to see how PAIR remained "in the green&quomccombs thompson-4/18/2000
36240 So Long, Until Tomorrow....(or sometime) After around two years struggling witDavid Browning-4/17/2000
36239 PAIR management pulled it out- The earnings statement clearly states that thereDaniel G. DeBusschere-4/13/2000
36238 Stock has rolled today. How come we never had this type of move into eps beforhelkel-4/13/2000
36237 I've held PAIR for almost 3 years. This company has NEVER failed to disappojohn p. carney-4/13/2000
36236 Now that we have collar on stock price, pair will probably exceed estimates by helkel-4/13/2000
36235 Possibly WORSE than estimates??? If the merger is to be a pooling of interestsDavid Browning-4/13/2000
36234 One cent under - that's my guess also. PAIR broke this tradition last quartDaniel G. DeBusschere-4/12/2000
36233 <Anyone care to guess?> PAIR does 1 cent worse than estimates. It is carjohn p. carney-4/12/2000
36232 <i>No pre announcements and positive price action today in spite of a verJim S-4/12/2000
36231 PAIR earnings at close on the 13th- No pre announcements and positive price actDaniel G. DeBusschere-4/12/2000
36230 Pairgain Investor Update ? April 2000 Questions and Answers about the PairGainbronco2-4/12/2000
36229 PAIR management have a lot of skin in this acquisition- If it blows, it will coDaniel G. DeBusschere-4/11/2000
36228 BWAC, 1) Promatory contract news, nothing on the number of CO's, 2) Pairgabill c.-4/11/2000
36227 Ok, this is interesting. But let's revisit the past. @Link first signed a cBWAC-4/11/2000
36226 Mike, I've always been confused about the @link/Pairgain contract. www.dsbill c.-4/11/2000
36225 bill c.-Thanks for the info. The report spells it all out in very clear detail.MikeM54321-4/11/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News