Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
4504	44	0	MAN

Emcee: Mark Bartlett	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
3729	The tuna analogy passed over me head.	Elizabeth Andrews	-	9/22/1999
3728	Wayne, It just so happens that short selling is a legitimate aspect of the mark	teevee	-	9/22/1999
3727	don't be afraid to speak your mind, son of liz!	TheBusDriver	-	9/22/1999
3726	Mark, A good uptick would be nice. I would dearly love to take another short po	teevee	-	9/22/1999
3725	Liz, MAN's behaviour is pretty standard. Much of the speculative money is	Mark Bartlett	-	9/22/1999
3724	Looks like pretty normal action to me liz but then what do I know I am just one	TheBusDriver	-	9/22/1999
3723	You are not a target for me but a pigeon for promoters. I'm just trying to	Elizabeth Andrews	-	9/21/1999
3722	<Not possible! > Howy, many of us can thank CC for finding this one man	James N. Wilson	-	9/16/1999
3721	<<they've been following Manhattan for longer than James>> Not	TrueScouse	-	9/15/1999
3720	I understood Sprott was due to put out a report out on Manhattan - anybody know	Jeff Dickson	-	9/15/1999
3719	No need for insults liz, what isn't clear? I'm really not interested i	Jeff Dickson	-	9/15/1999
3718	Jeff, your answer with respect to my question about the concept of dilution rem	Elizabeth Andrews	-	9/14/1999
3717	In terms of future earnings and existing voting rights, of course. However I&#	Jeff Dickson	-	9/14/1999
3716	So Jeff, is the proposed financing at C$5.50 dilutive? Discuss.	Elizabeth Andrews	-	9/14/1999
3715	Bruce, I'll send you the exact reference in private mail. Discusses the d	Jeff Dickson	-	9/14/1999
3714	I understand the concept liz, don't worry. Don't play me, I'm not	Jeff Dickson	-	9/14/1999
3713	As I expected you don't understand the concept. Maybe you should be offerin	Elizabeth Andrews	-	9/13/1999
3712	Jeff, I think everyone is a little confused re massive sulfides. There are no	Bruce Robbins	-	9/13/1999
3711	<<Finanicing though the sale of shares is dilution pure and simple.>&	Claude Cormier	-	9/13/1999
3710	<<If the financing is indeed to cover feasibility costs then it would ap	Claude Cormier	-	9/13/1999
3709	<< Your tuna is fine. >> I donno...still swimming in circles<gr	TheBusDriver	-	9/13/1999
3708	Wayne, Your tuna is fine. I was merely pointing out there is a difference bet	Jeff Dickson	-	9/13/1999
3707	What the hell are you two talking about? Finanicing though the sale of shares	TheBusDriver	-	9/13/1999
3706	We should thank them for putting up the money that led to confirmation of TG1 a	Jeff Dickson	-	9/13/1999
3705	Hi Jeff... >>Just ask the folks that were in the financing at $9 a coupl	Sailfish	-	9/13/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):