SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5195 110 0 IDCC
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3770 FROM RB: AT&T & IDC By: renntech Reply To: None Manx-2/6/2000
3769 FROM RB: By: telcom_guru Reply To: 49975 by continuum Manx-2/6/2000
3768 LU BLAST technology... Following courtesy of Khan on the QCOM S&P500 threaw molloy-2/6/2000
3767 Gus - on the RadioWallstreet interview with Rip Tilden, I was struck by the relScott Zion-2/5/2000
3766 Gus, << evolution of the symbiotic relationship between top tier manufacEric L-2/5/2000
3765 Eric, I have nothing to add to the amount of conjecture out there, but I do hGus-2/5/2000
3764 Gus, << The great CDMA no-show >> What is your take on this? The Eric L-2/5/2000
3763 Darrell, Several interesting developments from the GSM Congress: 1) Blue chiGus-2/5/2000
3762 <i>All that's left is for the jurors to decide if there was infringemBux-2/5/2000
3761 Molly, I gave you a total of 275 million in licensing revenues plus I had a fewJim Lurgio-2/5/2000
3760 Molly "Darrell figures claim approx 6% royalty rate ($3.13 on a $55 BOM &#D.J.Smyth-2/5/2000
3759 "got involved in mobile wireless, but up till 3-98 they are still just thiD.J.Smyth-2/5/2000
3758 1997 was the ultimate year for "ultraphone" sales. Got up to sales oLance Bredvold-2/5/2000
3757 >> There's a lot of information in the SEC nd you and Bux should freqw molloy-2/4/2000
3756 >> amazing. you demonstrated that you want others to do your research forw molloy-2/4/2000
3755 "are bogus - as I have demonstrated." amazing. you demonstrated thatD.J.Smyth-2/4/2000
3754 Molly; both you and bux are obviously quite intelligent and good writers. you D.J.Smyth-2/4/2000
3753 Molly, You said: Where in the financials is the distinction made between upfronJim Lurgio-2/4/2000
3752 Molly I don?t think Darrel is that far off . Here?s what came up with. Samsung Jim Lurgio-2/4/2000
3751 Thread With scale economics clearly in favor of 2g TDMA/GSM over 2g CDMA and tGus-2/4/2000
3750 Wayne - " I appreciate your perspective." Thankyou Wayne. >> w molloy-2/4/2000
3749 w molloy, thanks for taking the time to double-check the claims being propagateBux-2/4/2000
3748 I appreciate your perspective. I've been fascinated by the debate between Wayne-2/4/2000
3747 <i> Qualcomm seems to succeed at overstating the case but gets rewarded iw molloy-2/4/2000
3746 <i>Now that the "upfront payments" from vendors has been eaten w molloy-2/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):