FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
41046	34	0	FTEL

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
37896	Yes, volumn is up. When I placed and order for 13/16 the MM raised the bid to 2	Jamey	-	9/22/1998
37895	" There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its def	JHP	-	9/22/1998
37894	Pat I hope you are right. Got in at 9 15/16 and out at .906 (Monday) - not	Phil Tuzz	-	9/22/1998
37893	volume is up	Hairy	-	9/22/1998
37892	Looks like some of the big brokerage houses are starting to take notice of this	Pat Garaffa	-	9/22/1998
37891	"There is no 1996 AT&T lawsuit against FTEL... Slanderous one"---	JHP	-	9/22/1998
37890	Vic, I don't think the webmistress reads this board much...however, maybe	DavidCG	-	9/22/1998
37889	<i>Hard numbers are the only real information that the street will react	Seth L.	-	9/22/1998
37888	TO WEBMASTER ********************************************** WILL YOU LIST THE N	vic klimpl	-	9/22/1998
37887	This stock was formerly MEME. But what is your point? It has nothing to do wi	DavidCG	-	9/22/1998
37886	Pardon the intrusion from a former poster and current lurker, but here is one w	Sly_	-	9/22/1998
37885	Scott, The flip side of hard numbers are scarey scenarios that have something	William Harvey	-	9/22/1998
37884	David, you have to admit that the street was very impressed also...NOT... with	SG	-	9/22/1998
37883	Have you read Frank Peter's message over the weekend? I am wondering what	DavidCG	-	9/22/1998
37882	This is just one other loose end that the outcome or status is not known becaus	Jamey	-	9/22/1998
37881	something is definitely fishy here . I had a buy order in all day at.906 and di	Dale Rustebakke	-	9/21/1998
37880	Jan I just deleted my msg because i thought it a bit too strong for some player	STK1	-	9/21/1998
37879	FTEL the good guys not the bad. ATT didn't know that FTEL was working with	jan fine	-	9/21/1998
37878	There is no 1996 lawsuit. Now let us look to July 1997 (not 1996, moron) >	DavidCG	-	9/21/1998
37877	There is no 1996 FTEL vs. AT&T news release to support your slander. Maybe	DavidCG	-	9/21/1998
37876	David--In 1996 ATT filed a LAWSUIT against FTEL-- lawsuits do not go away by th	JHP	-	9/21/1998
37875	you said>>>>There is <b>no 1996 AT&T lawsuit against FTEL	zonkie	-	9/21/1998
37874	There is no 1996 AT&T lawsuit against FTEL... Slanderous one. Nice Try. Do	DavidCG	-	9/21/1998
37873	"There is no AT&T lawsuit against FTEL. Slanderous one."---------	JHP	-	9/21/1998
37872	David, Thank you for posting that. I'm going to call my broker and follow	RinConRon	-	9/21/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):