SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5195 110 0 IDCC
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3820 Just for the sake of keeping things straight, Q is Qwest, not Qualcomm. It wouIlaine-2/9/2000
3819 What we were talking about was the relocation of Ericsson IP to the DC metro arIlaine-2/9/2000
3818 <i>Bux is something else. Your lawyer friend basically humiliated him aboBux-2/9/2000
3817 <i>it is believed that Qcom will license their essential technology to ARBux-2/9/2000
3816 You talk about migr today....where were you a month ago when I bought it at .30Al's Fun-2/9/2000
3815 LOL Jim. Molly is just a pain in the arse wherever he goes. Could actually beGus-2/9/2000
3814 Bux , You were right and it wasn't you that said " Why aren't IDC Jim Lurgio-2/9/2000
3813 "is Nokia even licensed by Qualcomm to commercialize W-CDMA infrastructureD.J.Smyth-2/9/2000
3812 <i>I wonder why ERICY didn't go to California to be closer to QualcomBux-2/9/2000
3811 Gus, I guess I was pretty close on my estimates of licensing revenues to Molly Jim Lurgio-2/9/2000
3810 <i> I wonder why ERICY didn't go to California to be closer to Qualcow molloy-2/9/2000
3809 A couple of things that still stick in my mind regarding the Mot case are theseJim Lurgio-2/9/2000
3808 yes, it's fluff isn't it. just as they "fluffed" all their cD.J.Smyth-2/9/2000
3807 I wonder why ERICY didn't go to California to be closer to Qualcomm? Hmmm. Jim Lurgio-2/9/2000
3806 From reading the Nokia web site one could conclude that Nokia has already develBux-2/9/2000
3805 Friday should be interesting: <b> The company's largest source of revGus-2/9/2000
3804 bux "There is a common misconception that Qualcomm has offered a 3G solutiD.J.Smyth-2/9/2000
3803 <i>This only goes to prove how crazy it is to have juries deciding patentGus-2/9/2000
3802 Nortel is generally acknowledged to be just ahead of Lucent in the race to deveGus-2/9/2000
3801 Individualinvestor.com:(2/9/00): Why We Still Like Interdigital Communications Manx-2/9/2000
3800 This only goes to prove how crazy it is to have juries deciding patents. My huIlaine-2/9/2000
3799 Thanks. FWIW, yesterday's Washington Times classified section has a quarteIlaine-2/9/2000
3798 From Individual Investor: "Why We Still Like Interdigital Communications&Glenn Petersen-2/9/2000
3797 Gus, I have copied your entire post below and have responded to each (supposedlBux-2/9/2000
3796 <i>....intrigued specifically about IDC's TDMA claim</i> Of thGus-2/9/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News