ACRT about to move to new highs | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
ACRT about to move to new highs

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
7054	12	0	ACRT

Emcee: Lance Viscioni	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
3829	Davef, once again you've got it wrong. Zucklaw has a zillion posts on SI an	Dan Packer	-	3/19/1998
3828	Paul, how nice to see you step back from attacks and counterattacks, to say not	Goulds	-	3/19/1998
3827	Andrew (and everyone else)- On this thread, we have seen continued attacks and	Paul Weiss	-	3/19/1998
3826	Teri, Could you please answer my question! Where is Mr. Aharoni and Mr. Stonk	Ryan Plovie (Hijacked)	-	3/19/1998
3825	You have again proven how little you know by putting in writing complete nonsen	CLEMENZA	-	3/19/1998
3824	By the way, just so you understand how slimey pink is.. Zucklaw on Yahoo has ha	Goulds	-	3/19/1998
3823	Shortsellers see the price of everything and the value of nothing. To them eve	ACRTrises	-	3/19/1998
3822	AndrewS, I did not say I think ACRT is worth 800 million dollars. I would appre	Goulds	-	3/19/1998
3821	You wrote<<<Do you know how many worthless patents are out there ???&g	Andrew Q. Viet	-	3/19/1998
3820	Jealous!	scott	-	3/19/1998
3819	Hello Lance, Just passing through eh? Aren't you the guy who started this	Jean-Philippe Chevalier	-	3/19/1998
3818	If you pinkophiles want to know a little more about your idol, go check out pos	Pinkswurstnightmare	-	3/19/1998
3817	Do you know how many worthless patents are out there ??? ACRT 's will be on	Andrew Spurlin	-	3/19/1998
3816	So now DAVEF you think ACRT is worth 800 miilion dollars ??? Wow ! " Much	Andrew Spurlin	-	3/19/1998
3815	why did the break out fail?	Jonathan Cleveland	-	3/19/1998
3814	Again< I can only say: patents must be non-obvious. Since electronic paymen	F. Lynn	-	3/19/1998
3813	You forgot to read the rest of the post. Disk drive business is fiercely compet	Andrew Q. Viet	-	3/19/1998
3812	Don't forget that the U.S. patent office granted them the patent? Do you th	Andrew Q. Viet	-	3/19/1998
3811	Flynn, there has not been prior use of the electronic TAD, and ACRT is taking a	Goulds	-	3/19/1998
3810	Check this out: sulcus.berkeley.edu A quote: To be patentable, an invention mus	F. Lynn	-	3/19/1998
3809	It is highly valid. Glaxo got the delivery process. Is the Electronic Transacti	Andrew Q. Viet	-	3/19/1998
3808	Thanks, Lance. Drop a note when you stop in again.	Goulds	-	3/19/1998
3807	Wrong, Flynn. The patent office does not accept the patent application until a	Goulds	-	3/19/1998
3806	You're wrong. Its enforceable only if the patent is uphold--which doesnt al	F. Lynn	-	3/19/1998
3805	GIGO. Don't get snippy with me---I am perfectly aware of what a peg ratio i	F. Lynn	-	3/19/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):