SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
2000: Y2K Civilized Discussion
An SI Board Since August 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
662 4 0
Emcee:  Jeff Mizer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
387 <b>NEW, REVISED Naval Y2K Report</b> - the one the government put oC.K. Houston-8/21/1999
386 <b>The U.S. State Department on Sept. 15 will release its biannual consulC.K. Houston-8/21/1999
385 Yawn Cheeky Kid-8/20/1999
384 Programmers' Great Debate; notice the reference to the SYSTEMIC 'faultKen-8/20/1999
383 <i>We present our final assessment of progress toward year 2000 readinessO. H. Rundell-8/20/1999
382 FINAL GARTNER REPORT. VERY COMPREHENSIVE: "substantial failures..." Ken-8/20/1999
381 guess it takes all kinds of ranchers to raise the beefsteak on our tables, fredbearcub-8/20/1999
380 More on Navy document and Martial law (plan on/about Dec 1 for its initial declKen-8/20/1999
379 bearcub, What do I think? I think that the only "no cost spring calf&quoFred Ragan-8/20/1999
378 fred, i loved your reply. an old rancher and i were talking about this very stbearcub-8/20/1999
377 <b>Ed Yardeni: "EYES WIDE SHUT" (August 10, 1999)</b> &C.K. Houston-8/20/1999
376 bearcub! Before you get hurt, I want to disabuse you of the notion of "stFred Ragan-8/20/1999
375 this thread is uptight, yes? of course, lassie wasn't a bitch. but i was ubearcub-8/20/1999
374vancouversun.com <i>>>He said the plan involved "being involveCheeky Kid-8/20/1999
373 MadDog, <i><b>President Clinton's top Y2K adviser, John KoskinO. H. Rundell-8/20/1999
372 Jeff- this article confirms or coorelates with other 'doomer'areticles Ken-8/20/1999
371 Wow!!!! Jorj X Mckie-8/20/1999
370 Ken is right on this - The Navy department Y2K report that has been circulatingJeff Mizer-8/20/1999
369bugnet.com Type in anything. Thousands of bugs out there everyday life and notCheeky Kid-8/20/1999
368 Check this one: (linked at the previous website I have you.) iee.org.uk and tflatsville-8/20/1999
367 THANK YOU!!!! Just did a scan of this doc - it looks to be exactly what I was Sea Otter-8/20/1999
366 Thanks flatsville. Yes, that is exactly correct. I got worried and re-read my Sea Otter-8/20/1999
365 Sea Otter-- Try this: y2k-status.org Good Luck. flatsville-8/20/1999
364 Sea Otter-- Some of us actually bothered to read your post and understood whenflatsville-8/20/1999
363 Thank you, John. Actually I plowed through this information this morning and wSea Otter-8/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News