SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Cryogenic Solutions Inc. (CYGS)
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4028 18 0 CYGS
Emcee:  J Curshen Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3878 Oh Ardian, don't run away so quickly. Aren't you going to offer some oHogger-11/11/1999
3877 Jeffy Boy, You are twisting again ... or, are you saying that you did find a hHogger-11/11/1999
3876 Jeffrey, Janice and any other rational folks on this thread ~ see y'all; inAdrian du Plessis-11/11/1999
3875 Oh, I see... we could find a hundred other court cases where Skillern was foundJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/11/1999
3874 Jeffie, We don't need speculation. The question to you and Janice and theHogger-11/11/1999
3873 <i>Was Mike ever charged, indicted or tried in the ATL case?</i> WJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/11/1999
3872 Lokk Jancie, I know all about that, but let's get back to the question youHogger-11/11/1999
3871 Jeffie boy, only if you can post something that addresses the original questionHogger-11/11/1999
3870 No Jancie, you certainly aren't going to get an apology on this matter ... Hogger-11/11/1999
3869 Jancie, You are again twisting and distorting to the nth degree ... to the degHogger-11/11/1999
3868 Jancie, <i>Why don't you ever do any research, Hogger? All you do isHogger-11/11/1999
3867 Oink!! (Wiping my eyes...) Think he remembers about the civil judgment againsJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3866 Oh my... it does appear dear old Hogger will be leaving us, after a heartfelt aJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/11/1999
3865 Now then, Virgil. I expect a profuse apology, though I doubt I'll get it. Janice Shell-11/11/1999
3864 Here are two documents, Hogger. Read them carefully. Pay particular attentionJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3863 <i>And by the way, who mentioned CIVIL actions, anyway. You have enough oJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3862 Jancie, I don't give a damn what your "point" was or is. You areHogger-11/11/1999
3861 "Heavy duty accusations"? Get real, Hogger: we merely quoted the neJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3860 Janice, you're squirming and twisting and wriggling away from the real issuHogger-11/11/1999
3859 Okay, Hogger, so Mike didn't get the chair for his role in his father'sJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3858 You're becoming increasingly belligerent and irrational, Hogger. I suggestJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3857 Janice, are you going to address the question ... are you going to accept my chHogger-11/11/1999
3856 Jancie, <i>What I said about this matter, Hogger, was that Mike SkillernHogger-11/11/1999
3855 Are you saying that it's "okay" for Mike to have helped his fatheJanice Shell-11/11/1999
3854 What I said about this matter, Hogger, was that Mike Skillern testified at his Janice Shell-11/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):