SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
WARNING- have you been warned by SI? Let's talk
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1614 8 0
Emcee:  epicure Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
389 Kugler is a broker, he was slamming RMIL 8-10 hrs. a day. The NASD recieved sevPugs-3/9/1998
388 <<You're all NUTS>> well, maybe, but in a <i> good </flickerful-3/9/1998
387 Besides everything else, you can change yourself at will... I'm not sure , robnhood-3/9/1998
386 Purething and All, I just thought I'd sneak in here and take post #386. ItLady Lurksalot-3/9/1998
385 traders lingo you mean...purethingIntrepid1-3/9/1998
384 <<<Shameful situation and although I was only a lurker then, I rememberobnhood-3/9/1998
383 Michael, Gosh, but I don't know what to say to you. Perhaps you should joiLady Lurksalot-3/9/1998
382 NO,NO,NO Holly, not "THE THREAT" some threats are so so , but now yourobnhood-3/9/1998
381 Russell, S.I suffered a huge public relations black eye when they kicked off BiIntrepid1-3/9/1998
380 Holly, I want to officially say, I have never been warned! And NO ONE loves a ggreenspirit-3/9/1998
379 rman, best not say that either. It sounds too much like a licorice liquer or aLady Lurksalot-3/9/1998
378 I'm getting paranoid, Hmmmm,, BUT I'm not, how did holly put it, A LUNArobnhood-3/9/1998
377 rman, I'm sorry, but I'm afraid you must not use the word "case&quLady Lurksalot-3/9/1998
376 ever see polanski's <i> the </i> <i><b> tenant ? &lflickerful-3/9/1998
375 <<<which would then be the basis for a complaint?>>> That, #robnhood-3/9/1998
374 <i>who's </i> <i><b>next? </i></b>flickerful-3/9/1998
373 Jim and Bonnie, I guess it's okay if you say "unos," but I warn yLady Lurksalot-3/9/1998
372 is that a <i> good </i> WOW or a <i> terrorized </i> WOflickerful-3/9/1998
371 Holly ,, I could be Maffioso you know,, If that were the case , I just might serobnhood-3/9/1998
370 rrman, right you are. Might not hurt to watch out for people who carry violin Lady Lurksalot-3/9/1998
369 <<<<So, since I don't live next door to a lunatic, does that merobnhood-3/9/1998
368 no. taht means <i><b> all </i> </b> of your next door nflickerful-3/9/1998
367 WOWrobnhood-3/9/1998
366 <<<So, since I don't live next door to a lunatic, does that mean trobnhood-3/9/1998
365 (jrb: nb*) as well you should be... she does have a way with <i>words ,&flickerful-3/9/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):