SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards

An SI Board Since April 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1100	28	0

Emcee: Jorj X Mckie	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
400	<<<Again, if Im not mistaken ( and I could be ) some of the charges aga	Chris land	-	4/13/2001
399	Uh-huh ... care to name them? ... might as well pop them perps ... in the meanti	marcos	-	4/13/2001
398	Oh, for heaven's sake. You have lost it. Everyone is much too busy to waste	Carolyn	-	4/13/2001
397	It's always a possibility. But then you start to border on the conspiracy me	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
396	Gloopie, this character need to talk to Keep It Simple. If anyone can tell him a	Carolyn	-	4/13/2001
395	Hey, I'm no fool dood! I never said everyone liked Bob. That said I doubt	Augustus Gloop	-	4/13/2001
394	Everything you posted indicates that you believe that they did not take a look a	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
393	Thank you but is that the issue at present? I think what I posted belonged on t	Chris land	-	4/13/2001
392	<<If I was SI Admin I would be taking real close notes as to who and what	Augustus Gloop	-	4/13/2001
391	At least you acknowledge the possibility.....and I will think until proven other	Neenny	-	4/13/2001
390	'<i>Does SI admin give a damn if people get saved or not? No</i>	marcos	-	4/13/2001
389	You may be right about the options etc etc etc. I just happen to disagree that t	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
388	You better be careful what you post on this thread. Some participants would cons	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
387	INSP fired many, many GNET employees after the merger took place. Not right away	Carolyn	-	4/13/2001
386	That's a possibility, but I think that until proven otherwise, I'll stic	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
385	<<Hows that for a good summation?>> Its your best one of the day. H	Augustus Gloop	-	4/13/2001
384	I'm not quite sure what you are trying to get across. Are you trying to mak	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
383	<<<Then I think he was able to land a new job, and the people on silico	Chris land	-	4/13/2001
382	<i>To keep it simple, I think it was just a situation where they had to ma	Neenny	-	4/13/2001
381	You're drunk aren't you??? shootiemisstargeteverytime.com	MulhollandDrive	-	4/13/2001
380	I beg your pardon. <i>Not due to a whim?</i> LOL! Have you followed	Carolyn	-	4/13/2001
379	Is that considered a personal attack? I can't tell, since earlier you seeme	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
378	Maybe you haven't been reading the posts about what I think happened. To ke	joseph krinsky	-	4/13/2001
377	Sheesh, marcos... you're such a trouble maker... I'm going over to ihu	smchan	-	4/13/2001
376	No, but like you, when his buddy drank from the straw and then it was his turn,	Jorj X Mckie	-	4/13/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):