SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Market Makers - What They Do and How They Do It
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
429 63 0
Emcee:  jjs_ynot Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
404Why, yes. Q16. Should short selling be prohibited for a period preceding a signiSavant-9/17/2000
403So, is there anything in that proposal that even remotely sounds like they'rMama Bear-9/17/2000
402They apparently are still receiving comments. Archive... sec.gov If they receiveSavant-9/17/2000
401Is dancy having a little trouble with reading comprehension? That concept proposMama Bear-9/17/2000
400If they outlawed shorting, it would simply mean the vast majority of those now lrjm2-9/17/2000
399From RB - By: dancey $$$ Reply To: None Saturday, 16 Sep 2000 at 11:29 PM EDT PCIMA-9/17/2000
398Good letter, however, the chances of OTC-BB stocks becoming marginable, in otherSavant-9/15/2000
397From "This Week's Pick": Many changes have been instituted by theCIMA-9/15/2000
396Standards just aren't what they used to be, are they? Prufreed? We don'tSavant-9/14/2000
395You would think a national magazine could get the name right ! Daytec ?? LOLrjm2-9/14/2000
394Every feel like you were getting stuffed like a sausage..you might not have beenSavant-9/14/2000
393The Nasdaq Level II fee reduction should help level the playing field somewhat. Savant-9/12/2000
392<i>The rule 144 limitations are many, complicated, and interesting. I wondFundamentls-8/30/2000
391Right you are, I was being lazy, and didn't look it up. It would make too mSavant-8/28/2000
390<i>Form three is an S-3 filing, isn't it?</i> No, Form 3 is an Fundamentls-8/28/2000
389rjm2, it is delayed. You get what you pay for. S.Savant-8/28/2000
388And then there is the matter of 8-Ks..I think we can agree..that these ARE VERY Savant-8/28/2000
387I'll let the EDGAR fellow speak for himself..""Without a doubt, thSavant-8/28/2000
386So is freedgar.com delayed ? I was under the impression it was real-time.rjm2-8/27/2000
385<i>Perhaps you missed the part about immediate PAPER access....by institutFundamentls-8/27/2000
384Perhaps you missed the part about immediate PAPER access....by institutions/analSavant-8/27/2000
383Selective disclosure is an issue, but this article missed the mark in one area iFundamentls-8/27/2000
382More on Selective disclosure. A good article in Forbes pointing out the time lagSavant-8/25/2000
381Senators and representatives should be added to the list. The SEC is politicallySavant-8/14/2000
380Investor Group Puts SEC Officials Under “FIRE” otcnn.com By Jack Burney PublCIMA-8/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):