SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5582 39 0 MTXX
Emcee:  StockDung Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4057Wow, Hank. Do you blame your folks for your need to compensate? Surely, they tMike M-12/15/2001
4056Mikey, I can out spend you without even breaking a sweat. That much has been eHank-12/15/2001
4055No. You aren't Dan. He has more class in his little finger than you do in Mike M-12/14/2001
4054Gee, I'm really impressed. With that kind of cash to toss around, I don'Hank-12/14/2001
4053"Now go play in the street." I'd love to Mikey but it's no fuHank-12/14/2001
4052I received the following news alert today. Gum Tech's new President and CEODanZ-12/13/2001
4051So Hank, I guess we know who has a comprehension problem don't we. I certaiMike M-12/13/2001
4050I see Mikey. You're well read but you just have a problem with comprehensioHank-12/13/2001
4049The world is full of buffoons questioning other's intelligence. By the way,Mike M-12/12/2001
4048Interesting article: siliconinvestor.com Too bad you're not smart enough tHank-12/12/2001
4047Wexler you are so stupid you can't even understand plainly written text. I Mike M-12/12/2001
4046Besides being consistently wrong about the GUMM stock fraud, you now convenientlBill Wexler-12/12/2001
4045Sure you did Billy. You probably even made twice that much with your COVD invesMike M-12/12/2001
4044<<<If Gum Tech could control what every person says about the company aBill Wexler-12/12/2001
4043Mad, it is only "imagination", in your imagination. When SWMAY and GUMike M-12/6/2001
4042The rest is all imagination, besides the nicotine thing is gone. Anyway 45kX$7=$Mad2-12/6/2001
4041<i>Is Zicam worth 56.5 mil. Davidson apparently doesn't think so as thMike M-12/6/2001
4040Interesting. the answer that best applies is "E" of course. BTW using Mad2-12/5/2001
4039I didn't get a copy of Hirt's paper today. Although I had a copy, I musHank-12/5/2001
4038Fair enough Mark...I suspect that some tire of the name calling. I would hope wMike M-12/5/2001
4037Bitter? No way. Obnoxious and disliked, maybe, but never bitter. No matter whaMark Marcellus-12/5/2001
4036Boy is this game fun... How about F)...You didn't hit the mark on any of tMike M-12/5/2001
4035An investment quiz: A company has 25 Million in cash and a market cap of 65 milMark Marcellus-12/4/2001
4034"I don't approve of any company bending rules, nor do I think that Gum Hank-12/4/2001
4033I didn't miss the other two links. You must have missed my comment that youDanZ-12/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):