SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
840 98 0 QQQ
Emcee:  M CAHILL Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
415YOu and I will both do well. Stay in touch and we shall watch as we walk into throbert duke-11/12/2000
414I'm telling you that as soon as a pres is selected it will be off to the racrobert duke-11/12/2000
413We will all need to wait and watch the next few week. I said it here first. QQQ robert duke-11/12/2000
412Bob- yes, and like most here I am saddled with long-term holding positions in coTopannuity-11/12/2000
411have you ever investigated a longer term position trading using a variation of ybob wallace-11/12/2000
410To restate my point... I've successfully traded QQQ using the following scheTopannuity-11/12/2000
409buy on weakness and sell on strength works well in a trading range buy on strenbob wallace-11/12/2000
408>Have you ever heard the phrase sell into strength, and buy on major weaknessIceberg-11/12/2000
407>I bought some more qqq at 74 yesterday. I am maxed out in this position roIceberg-11/12/2000
406Have you ever heard the phrase sell into strength, and buy on major weakness. Girobert duke-11/12/2000
405We will just have to wait and see. Remember what happened last time the qqq wererobert duke-11/12/2000
404I really think we are in for a big rally. I bought some more qqq at 74 yesterdayrobert duke-11/12/2000
403Fred I have to agree with you, I have been scaling in during the whole decline bob wallace-11/12/2000
402I do not find myself in deep agreement with iceberg or robert duke. I'm lonFred Gohlke-11/11/2000
401>It is only dropping because of this election crap I think so too. It'sIceberg-11/11/2000
400I agree. TA or no TA. <eom> IceIceberg-11/11/2000
399>problem with your post is that it is not based on the actual market trend Iceberg-11/11/2000
398Robert- problem with your post is that it is not based on the actual market trenTopannuity-11/11/2000
397I think we will break to the upside as we enter xmas and this pres stuff gets sorobert duke-11/11/2000
396I bought some more this morning. I did not buy a ton of the qqq's but a buncrobert duke-11/11/2000
395BUYandHOLD, How do you determine if a particular qqq leap is at a decent price?Dave Pestle-11/11/2000
394<i>I bought the qqq at 78 78 82 and 83. </i> Hey duke, you still honeverenough-11/10/2000
393Well nobody believed me when I said rfmd will hit 15 or avnx will hit 80 or lowerobert duke-11/7/2000
392I somewhat doubt that. QQQ 100 is equiv to approx Nasdaq 4200. Some how I dont sBUYandHOLD-11/6/2000
391I bought the qqq at 78 78 82 and 83. I would not be surprise if it hits 100 by xrobert duke-11/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News