INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)

An SI Board Since April 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
5102	19	0	INPR

Emcee: Kashish King	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
4177	Tom: I thought that the issue had been settled. But, since it hasn't. You a	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4176	Hi; Does anyone feel we will get a significant boost from the Linux Expo next	LPG	-	1/28/2000
4175	The INPR conference call is available at 1-800-475-6701, #493303 until Feb. 2.	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4174	Darell, You also skipped over a few other questions I had but I guess that'	Tom C	-	1/28/2000
4173	Tom: No offense taken. Actually, I have taken it as a compliment.	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4172	Darrell, <i>(By the way, it would be illegal for anybody important from	Tom C	-	1/28/2000
4171	Tom: I gave you a direct answer. I'm a shareholder nothing more. You'll	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4170	Darell, Sorry, I am asking a direct question. Please give me a direct answer.	Tom C	-	1/28/2000
4169	Tom: Same as yours I suppose. Probably less. I'm probably poorer than you!	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4168	Darrell, What is your relationship to Inprise? Tom	Tom C	-	1/28/2000
4167	TTOBST: Please don't get mad. I'm not really directing these posts at y	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4166	TTOBST: You stated that: "No one wants to put money into a 100% absolute l	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4165	Darrell I do not disagree with your or Dennis Nicks' views please see my 41	TTOSBT	-	1/28/2000
4164	TTOBST: You stated "Why can't Inprise be the COM in .COM? or the organ	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4163	TTOBST: You stated, "But IMO the write-downs (albeit one offs) have taken	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4162	TTOBST: You stated, "If as you say; " The great part about the Linux	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4161	Dennis first off let me thank you for correctly bringing to my attention the Q/	TTOSBT	-	1/28/2000
4160	Correction from theStreet.com: "In the same article, the table containing	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4159	TO ALL: It's unbelievable, the way most of us can't see the "fores	Big Dog	-	1/28/2000
4158	TTOSBT, I'm seeing a pattern here. Every quarter, you seem to think the re	Dennis Nicks	-	1/28/2000
4157	Re: <i>" It's no secret that a large part of the campus lies emp	TTOSBT	-	1/28/2000
4156	Re: <i>"You seem to be giving no account to the Kylix development un	TTOSBT	-	1/28/2000
4155	<i>The most significan writedown, and the puzzling one is the real estate	i-node	-	1/28/2000
4154	Just another YAHOO board refugee. I've posted occasionally on the Yahoo IN	smallaxe	-	1/28/2000
4153	This post contains an article about the Transmeta chip: Message 12707438 It s	Carolyn	-	1/28/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):