SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Racom Systems (RCOM)
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
468 4 0 RCOM
Emcee:  Gutterball Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
418 Racom Systems Inc.'s NASDAQ Ticker Symbol Changes RACOM SYSTEMS INC. TickGutterball-3/2/1999
417 It appears Racom is close to completing its financing. Now that the reverse hasGutterball-3/1/1999
416 Racom Systems Board of Directors Authorizes Reverse Split Issuance of PreferreGutterball-3/1/1999
415 Price now listed as $2 - looks like 1:5 reverse split perhaps? Paul Paul Schmidt-3/1/1999
414 Ed Price, a broker at Spencer Edwards, who seems very close to the RACOM situaAdolf E. Fullgrabe-2/28/1999
413 I have no personal knowledge of the status of RCOM or RCOMD but another stock IDavid C. Burns-2/28/1999
412 Richard, For RCOM, E-Trade shows "0" shares trading at "0."Richard Ormsby-2/28/1999
411 HELP please. Yahoo Quote says RCOM has changed its ticker symbol to RCOMD, but Richard Wright-2/27/1999
410 To follow up on my comments... Two of the technology thrusts are: 1) Access CGutterball-2/23/1999
409 Thanks Dan I appreciate your help in this. Paul Paul Schmidt-2/23/1999
408 As I recall, Racom is focused on three principal thrusts. I'll have to go bGutterball-2/23/1999
407 Dan, Could you explain Racom's current business strategy to me as you undePaul Schmidt-2/23/1999
406 Good volume on Racom today, 73,900 shares. Price also moved up 1/8 or 36%. ClosGutterball-2/22/1999
405 Cubic Transportation Systems Awarded $30.8 Million Contract To Build New BART FGutterball-2/22/1999
404 Not alone. It would be a shame if this firm would snuff it - FRAM seems like rPaul Schmidt-2/16/1999
403 As this seems to be the loneliest message board on the web - Nobody will take nJAMES WEATHERFORD-2/15/1999
402 Uh Huh. Mmmmm. Nice to see there were only buyers today. Anyway?JAMES WEATHERFORD-2/4/1999
401 James... Called twice. Left a message. No answer. Will keep trying. SincerelyMarty Lee-2/4/1999
400 I believe the question was - Has a date been set? Regards, JW JAMES WEATHERFORD-2/3/1999
399 James. RCOM's assets are thoroughly intellectual. The company must sell itMarty Lee-2/3/1999
398 Much Obliged. First began accumulating rcom at a dollar, due to a good chart pJAMES WEATHERFORD-2/2/1999
397 James.. I'll call and find out.. Marty Marty Lee-2/2/1999
396 Has a date been set for this travesty of fortune known as a reverse split? JAMES WEATHERFORD-2/1/1999
395 W.F. Schwertley, Wouldn't be buying now. Reverse Splits are ugly. RCOM wilMarty Lee-1/31/1999
394 To All, Anyone care to discuss the reverse split on the basis of one share forW.F. Schwertley-1/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News