SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4200Conflict is one thing. I have no problem with namecalling. But if, say, I wereThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4199If you, his arch enemy can't justify it, which you haven't so far; why sone_less-1/27/2003
4198You should check it out. You might find that the suspension was warranted by hiThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4197One of the sound bites that I heard today by a peacenic spokes person was that hone_less-1/27/2003
4196Those who are able to think clearly and rationally (when on their anti-psychoticone_less-1/27/2003
4195How does this distinguish you from the average libertarian?Neocon-1/27/2003
4194Fine. My view is that they ought to be in treatment, whether in an asylum or in Neocon-1/27/2003
4193He called Hitler a Nancyboy?one_less-1/27/2003
4192And sometimes people are unable to confront the possibility of conflict because Neocon-1/27/2003
4191He called Chris a nancyboy again?one_less-1/27/2003
4190y'rrrr too funnyaverage joe-1/27/2003
4189A couple of weeks.....Neocon-1/27/2003
4188huh? wha.... Are we gossiping about jla again??? I feel so out of it. I didn'one_less-1/27/2003
4187Silly... <i>"That's the problem with the desert approach."&one_less-1/27/2003
4186<i>"I'm alternately arguing the principle and the practical issueone_less-1/26/2003
4185<i>"What do you have to say about him?"</i> First, he doeone_less-1/26/2003
4184If you need any more reasons to legalize drugs and end the illegal drug trade, hThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4183I don't disagree with you but there can be no societal consensus, i.e. an enaverage joe-1/25/2003
4182I was drinking my usual evening glass of grape juice, but unfermented. VintageThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4181I am a classical liberal, not a neo-liberal. Classical liberalism had a healthThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4180We have people living the way they choose to live, in contravention of the moresThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4179But P.S. Why is it okay to take a shot at the manliness of people based on theiThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4178I'm not aware how long the sentence is. Perhaps it was intended as a statemThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4177I am sure Charleymane enjoyed his bowl of grapes last night. I believe he hastheeleventhmuse-1/25/2003
4176Good night......Neocon-1/25/2003
4175With such comprehensive cynicism, I do not see how you can consider yourself to Neocon-1/25/2003
4174Right now the problem is failure to intervene, not over-institutionalization. WeNeocon-1/25/2003
4173I am on line now merely because I had some work to finish. I decided to answer mNeocon-1/25/2003
4172The spouse has called me to bed. Good night.The Philosopher-1/25/2003
4171Good luck. They say that people should never watch either laws or sausage beiThe Philosopher-1/25/2003
4170Your faith in the integrity of judges and courts is touching. Keep in mind thThe Philosopher-1/24/2003
4169Well, all I can say is that it would be my intention to see well defined criteriNeocon-1/24/2003
4168I do not consider him to have a grasp of the facts.......Neocon-1/24/2003
4167Does one need to know the whole story to know that the language being used was dThe Philosopher-1/24/2003
4166I am afraid you do not know the whole story, and I am not sure I want to get intNeocon-1/24/2003
4165This is a fascinating, quite scary article. nyobserver.comThe Philosopher-1/24/2003
4164I will get back to you on that.....Neocon-1/24/2003
4163Helping in an emergency is obligatory, whether or not someone does it. As for reNeocon-1/24/2003
4162Trust me. There is ALWAYS room for legislating from the bench. I had one notoThe Philosopher-1/24/2003
4161I do not think the chipping away is by court decision, but by statute. If it is Neocon-1/24/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News