SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2
An SI Board Since April 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5315 65 0
Emcee:  Neenny Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4340Msg Replied To: "... of course I would feel my rights were denied if I werd:oug-4/29/2003
4339Do they smell the same on the way out?c.horn-4/29/2003
4338That's easy. Krispy Kreme donuts and Pepsi. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner. The Philosopher-4/29/2003
4337Chris, Doug didn't ask my opinion of SI boards, he asked me specifically whaBux-4/29/2003
4336Deny members or members posts Just different ways of denying people. When I firmmmary-4/29/2003
4335Let's see. It's almost 5 pm here on the east coast. Taking into account c.horn-4/29/2003
4334Your double standard is in contending that there's something wrong if IH letThe Philosopher-4/29/2003
4333Chris, there is no double standard: SI doesn't claim access to <b>ALLBux-4/29/2003
4332<i>Doug, of course I would feel my rights were denied if I were denied theThe Philosopher-4/29/2003
4331SI's former top cop hard at work. "I wrote a PERL script to zap his poSmiling Bob-4/29/2003
4330Doug, of course I would feel my rights were denied if I were denied the right toBux-4/29/2003
4329Bux, Since iHub does not have a Si type moderator thread where he or she whom crd:oug-4/29/2003
4328Hey wait, I thought you don't have to pay!! >>Where I come from, we cdawgfan2000-4/29/2003
4327I know, it was foolish... <i>"You paid for that site? "</i&gBux-4/29/2003
4326<i>"I didn't pay $129.00 to become part of a three-ring circus.&qSmart_Money-4/29/2003
4325Greg, I did not drag it over here. The subject was the alleged email list impropBux-4/28/2003
4324re: <i> Matt is just furthering his young grudge (against me) by trying togreg s-4/28/2003
4323Matt, it's funny how you chastise me for supposed e-mail improprieties when Bux-4/28/2003
4322<<in the last year that I can recall, have been aliases of you (25-30+ nowMark Johnson-4/28/2003
4321Doug, why didn't I defend myself when Matt hinted that I had done something Bux-4/28/2003
4320Reply to Msg from Matt Brown: "... bet even Mary would disagree with what d:oug-4/28/2003
4319>>every post at iFlub is attached to an ad.... Where I come from, we callMatt Brown-4/28/2003
4318You have sold out....every post at iFlub is attached to an ad....Matt you have bMark Johnson-4/28/2003
4317:) Sent it in PM instead.c.horn-4/28/2003
4316I'm afraid you are right C.Horn. iHub is about as biased as the investment fBux-4/28/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):