SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5195 110 0 IDCC
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4370 O.K, but keep in mind, the rebuttals I have seen are not worth the pixels they Bux-6/26/2000
4369 Bux, perhaps you misunderstood the most important part of my previous message: postyle-6/26/2000
4368 Jacobs is about the furthest from arrogant as possible. What started Qualcomm&#Bux-6/26/2000
4367 Postyle, you are mistaken about this: <b>In addition to the 10Mhz limitaBux-6/26/2000
4366 Bux look where QCOM was in March 1999. It was not a giant. What started their rBulls-6/26/2000
4365 Correction, I noticed a typo in my post #4360. The "over" in the thirBux-6/26/2000
4364 <i>Why do the IDC shareholders continue to parade this around as if it mepostyle-6/26/2000
4363 Restricted Bandwidth : Thanks for your (civil) clarification - many on the Q w molloy-6/26/2000
4362 No, Gus-ano, I didn't leave here because of the Brazilian decision. I leftcarranza2-6/26/2000
4361 Gus, you claim you assumed a "very low royalty rate" but you fail to Bux-6/26/2000
4360 Good news on Orange/Sonera: ragingbull.com Good news on Orange/Sonera: (UbiD.J.Smyth-6/26/2000
4359 Postyle, the 10Mhz limitation is not much of a limit from a practical standpoinBux-6/26/2000
4358 w molloy, <i>you said in your earlier post that the QCOM-IDCC settlement postyle-6/26/2000
4357 You're confused, Molly. I assumed a very low royalty rate on a very conserGus-6/26/2000
4356 molly, Perhaps I shouldn't intercede in the lively discussion you seem to Frank-6/26/2000
4355 On royalty revenue stream calculations Your analysis would have better credibiw molloy-6/26/2000
4354 <i> What is royalty paid on? ASP, BOM or the price of the ASIC? Haven'Gus-6/26/2000
4353 Gus, Of course you're right.Frank-6/26/2000
4352 >> that last post has got to hurt. It does indeed. QCOM was a $160 on Jw molloy-6/26/2000
4351 >> 1% (royalty rate) x [80% (TDMA/GSM) x 120m (handsets sold by Nokia) x w molloy-6/26/2000
4350 I know, Frank. But consider the other side of that conversation. lolGus-6/26/2000
4349 Gus, Your assumption is flawed. You are assuming mostly handset and missing oFrank-6/26/2000
4348 Um Molley, that last post has got to hurt. QCOM @ 160 in Feb. What a hoooot. Bulls-6/26/2000
4347 Yeah, you're confused alright. You actually believe that somebody is goingGus-6/26/2000
4346 Good of you to check up on me Gus. I confused my QCOM sale with when I bought tw molloy-6/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News