SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Disciplined Investing, especially the NAIC way
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
469 14 0
Emcee:  The Philosopher Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
44 I will look at borders. Y ou are not kidding about the difference in info. I Barbara Hospel-5/26/1999
43 Borders Group is one we have done (and purchased) recently. Check it out. OuThe Philosopher-5/25/1999
42 It might be interesting for you to give me one of y0ur stocks that you have anBarbara Hospel-5/25/1999
41 Welcome. I'll look forward to your postings when you get to it. I, too, sThe Philosopher-5/25/1999
40 Dear Chris, I read in the NAIC I-CLub List (about 100 messages a day..ugh) thaBarbara Hospel-5/25/1999
39 I don't know if this is of interest to the thread, but here is how you can Chuzzlewit-5/17/1999
38 On top of what you quoted, the basic goal of the NAIC is to pick stocks that wiThe Philosopher-5/15/1999
37 Christopher, your thread sounds interesting...But what IS the NAIC way? A searjbe-5/15/1999
36 Christopher, I have several screening criteria that I use for various purposes.Chuzzlewit-5/14/1999
35 I basically agree about APOL, though I'm still looking at it a bit. A newiThe Philosopher-5/13/1999
34 After some consideration, I think that APOL is not an NAIC stock. The combinatSteven Dopp-5/13/1999
33 We were aware of the heavy institutional and inside ownership. We were not awaSteven Dopp-4/28/1999
32 Your comment on Presidency makes sense, but I would wouldn't do it that wayThe Philosopher-4/28/1999
31 Heck, they already bought Apollo at this month's meeting. We bought at $23Steven Dopp-4/28/1999
30 Do you have a URL for the Inc article, and is it available to non-suscribers? The Philosopher-4/28/1999
29 Have to agree about the voting issue. My club dumped a stock for, in part, theSteven Dopp-4/28/1999
28 More on APOL. Haven't received annual report and 10K yet, but one thing boThe Philosopher-4/28/1999
27 <i>f I were starting all over again, I'd require all prospective membThe Philosopher-4/27/1999
26 Off the top, I'd probably assign APOL a high p/e of around 45. APOL is a pSteven Dopp-4/27/1999
25 Thanks for the response. I agree that a high p/e of 75 is too high and needs tSteven Dopp-4/26/1999
24 Correction: For some reason I had thought you had suggested that Apollo was inThe Philosopher-4/26/1999
23 Thanks for sending the SSG on APOL. The history is certainly interesting. GroThe Philosopher-4/26/1999
22 Chris, I just e-mailed you my ssg file on Apollo. Actually, I use Stock AnalysSteven Dopp-4/24/1999
21 We leave the buying up to the club treasurer. That is, the club determines if Steven Dopp-4/15/1999
20 <i>Based on the messages posted to date, I'm glad I was not the The Philosopher-4/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):