SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
MAGS - Magal Security - Airport Bomb Detection + more
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
394 7 0 MAGS
Emcee:  Mike Fredericks Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
44 Mark as you said - I am a value oriented investor - but I will buy what I thinkOak Kanis-7/31/1996
43 These stocks only go up in times of tragedy - VERY UNFORTUNATE. I wish we had Oak Kanis-7/31/1996
42 Look under topic 'Airline Security Fundamental Analysis' for earnings estockvalinvestor-7/31/1996
41 I believe the reason is that ICTSF has only been public for a little over a monstockvalinvestor-7/31/1996
40 re: ICTSF looks like a great buy at current levels! I agree. I do wonder why tbob mackey-7/30/1996
39 ICTSF looks like a great buy at current levels! Reasons- earnings estimate of 0stockvalinvestor-7/30/1996
38 I hate to short a good company.... But this one appeared to me to be massivelybob mackey-7/30/1996
37 The .07 was the estimate for this quarter, whether it was below last year'sMike Fredericks-7/30/1996
36 It may take some time to get contracts out - by then who knows whose technologyOak Kanis-7/30/1996
35 Again, thanks R. for your note of concern.....Those short sellers are the most TATRADER-7/29/1996
34 You must be kidding - you bought this while it was crashing? I can see long teOak Kanis-7/29/1996
33 Thanks Oak for your note of caution.....MAGSF went down today because of a bad TATRADER-7/29/1996
32 Bennett, I do not believe in buying stocks on the way down....You are a very luTATRADER-7/29/1996
31 I bought in at 10.125 at 3:45PM. My conclusion from the news reports that I cuChris Kay-7/29/1996
30 MAGSF fell due to brokerage report RESEARCH ALERT - Magal (MAGSF.O) cut to selChris Kay-7/29/1996
29 But would you buy it on the way down? If so, what would you consider a signifiBennett Zimmerman-7/29/1996
28 I have been burned by listening to analysts and recommendations - who hasn'Oak Kanis-7/29/1996
27 Mark be VERY careful! I think this is the end of the road for these stocks forOak Kanis-7/29/1996
26 Brokers say both INVN and MAGSF have been heavily shorted. They do not have anyR.shubhada-7/29/1996
25 David, MAGSF has its business presently in many different foreign countries...ITATRADER-7/29/1996
24 Good call Oak...MAGSF was way overbought....This correction is healthy.....I diTATRADER-7/29/1996
23 Anyone-- So if the BARR CEO says that they have FAA, approval, is this bad newDavid Lee-7/29/1996
22 Some analyst on CNBC downgraded stock today..Said it was way overbought...Also Tracker-7/29/1996
21 Nice plunge in the last 30 minutes... 14.5 down to 11.25. Anyone hear anythingMike Fredericks-7/29/1996
20 Looks like the pullbacks are starting. IMO only. I took my profits over at INVNOak Kanis-7/29/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):