SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
2000-Year of the Biotechs!
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1142 41 0
Emcee:  Arthur Radley Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
442 Wouldn't touch with a "20 foot-pole"(I know the normal size pole Arthur Radley-3/4/2000
441 Any opinions here on PBTKE? finance.yahoo.com Thanks, RTSReturn to Sender-3/4/2000
440 BusinessWeek(March 6th Edition) article supports many of your thoughts. One beiArthur Radley-3/4/2000
439 The future of most Biotechs will be different from the past. 1.The good ones Jongmans-3/4/2000
438 So far.....biotechs have been the place to be in 2000. Now it is very importantArthur Radley-3/4/2000
437 I predict investors will be kicking themselves if they don't invest in biotColleen M-3/4/2000
436 At the article gave some reasons vs. just stating the ratings. I wish they woulJack Hartmann-3/3/2000
435 Interesting article on 6 biotechs to avoid..I don't necessarily agree on alArthur Radley-3/3/2000
434 Thanks for the replies. I have no particular expertise to contribute here, justVolcano888-3/3/2000
433 Usually lurk, but thought I add GNLB's chart. Sure looks good to me. askreFrederick Langford-3/2/2000
432 Don, Your thoughts on GNLB mirror my thoughts. Volcano, if you read my originaArthur Radley-3/2/2000
431 vol, the science-heads don't always reply, so i'll make a minor stab. Don England-3/2/2000
430 Greetings. Have you guys checked and discussed GNLB? Couldn't find any postVolcano888-3/2/2000
429 Tex, We agree far too much.... I'd love to hold both, but I cannot afford Torben Noerup Nielsen-3/2/2000
428 I'm with you on NABI...I hold a larger position in them over AQLA, but I thArthur Radley-3/2/2000
427 Tex, If I had the funds, I'd put some in Aquila as well as NABI. But on baTorben Noerup Nielsen-3/2/2000
426 Whoa Nellie! NABI is ripping again this morning. AQLA isn't far behind.(:&gArthur Radley-3/2/2000
425 Tex, Looks pretty much like they'll follow NABI.... Thanks, TorbenTorben Noerup Nielsen-3/2/2000
424 In my post..http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=12968773 I mentioArthur Radley-3/2/2000
423 texasdude, Did you say no revenues? I specialize in such plays. My 2000 gain isJesse Livermore-3/1/2000
422 Tex, Utter-Nonsense aside, NABI is an $11 stock. For today. But there's trTorben Noerup Nielsen-2/29/2000
421 enjoying your thots as always. love to see nabi rising. it's #5 in my portDon England-2/29/2000
420 With today's close, it ends two months for my 2000 biotech selections....noArthur Radley-2/29/2000
419 Tex, The press release is *highly* interesting. I'd suggest reading it carTorben Noerup Nielsen-2/28/2000
418 Tex, NABI is doing well today. After a bit of soul searching over the weekend,Torben Noerup Nielsen-2/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News