SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4504 44 0 MAN
Emcee:  Mark Bartlett Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4429I believe if you mine the other deposits first, the project is uneconomic. By micharred-6/9/2002
4428You the stockholder is misinformed.charred-6/9/2002
4427Russ, I'll take that back. MAN invested 58 million. Probably 10 or 15 milliocharred-6/9/2002
4426Good post.charred-6/9/2002
4425I agree. Both did. Actually both lied. One said to it's stockholders that thcharred-6/9/2002
4424Nope, i already bought too many of them. Not much ROI in it.. :-) best, grugrusum-6/9/2002
4423Dear G9, I think I will bet on the government getting its way. The people who llbs1989-6/9/2002
4422Hi lbs1989, To me, it shows how Peru's government is thinking, which is whagrusum-6/9/2002
4421Dear G9, Well that didn't take long!! Does this mean I am a guru now?I thinlbs1989-6/9/2002
4420some news on Manhattan... Saturday June 8, 12:55 pm Eastern Time Reuters Comgrusum-6/9/2002
4419Dear Russ, Have met government officials in 5 countries on different types of plbs1989-6/8/2002
4418<Management has goofed up.> ? If so, then apparently the Peruvian State arusswinter-6/7/2002
4417I still think it will happen if other deposits in the area are mined. I still doAlbert V-6/7/2002
4416do we know what the land-ownership situation is in the area? after reading the Npeter snowdon-6/7/2002
4415Charred- I am not immune to the desire to keep a pretty area pristine. But if tAlbert V-6/6/2002
4414"disclosure of your intent and interests?", What do you think?charred-6/6/2002
4413After all these years and posts albeit not a 100% win all around you do not mentChuca Marsh-6/6/2002
4412What? It's too simple. They don't want the mine. Even if 50% said yes tocharred-6/6/2002
4411Maybe...So is the river on the MAP BONE DRY? Seasonal, deep enough, or wide enouChuca Marsh-6/6/2002
4410Why take a chance of messing up the lime production. Flash floods by El Niñcharred-6/6/2002
4409(Albert V-6/5/2002
4408Charred, With all due respect to you,why do critics make it sound like the mine Albert V-6/5/2002
4407Part of the surfcae disturbance just for the GOILD at the MAN MAP on the orebodyChuca Marsh-6/4/2002
4406The OTHER news RELEASAE ssaid that 25% of the Area of the Design was envolved NOChuca Marsh-6/4/2002
4405President Alejandro Toledo must be careful how he manages this situation. He wascharred-6/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):