SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Vitesse Semiconductor
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4710 150 0 VTSS
Emcee:  Dr_of_Microcaps Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4535>>My take is that VTSS will now be acquired,... Only after the 'issueJakeStraw-4/20/2006
4534Oh crap, the only thing slimier than the option shenanigans are lawyers trying tFJB-4/20/2006
4533ADI did it as well. Actually quite a few companies are known to have done it - aTaro-4/20/2006
4532I hear UNH may have done the same thing...JakeStraw-4/20/2006
4531You got that one right. Power struggle between the CEO and the board, I guess. CTaro-4/20/2006
4530Backdating Stock Option Grants by: wtchdg7 04/20/06 05:50 am Msg: 178298 of 178Taro-4/20/2006
4529mopgcw, I doubled down this morning at 2.41 average. I have a low share cost asELH1006-4/20/2006
4528Is it for sure this happened 6-9 years ago? Makes one wonder why this would comwrm1-4/19/2006
4527<i>taking from the shareholders to line up the deal for the employees may The Ox-4/19/2006
4526What it sounds like they didn't break the law back then. This was way beforeTaro-4/19/2006
4525That's all over the place and well documented. If you cannot find it easily Taro-4/19/2006
4524>> This took place 6-9 years ago I wasn't aware of that. Where did yUncle Frank-4/19/2006
4523Are you saying it's ok if they broke the law, as long as all the employees bThe Ox-4/19/2006
4522Never forget that 1. This took place 6-9 years ago 2. All employees participatiTaro-4/19/2006
4521waiting for more info, but initial thought is it could be an interesting opportumopgcw-4/19/2006
4520So are you buying more at these prices? I hope you're right...Dr. Id-4/19/2006
4519i disagree. regardless of the option nonsense and their greed, they have been emopgcw-4/19/2006
4518Me too. Will sink me in our contest on Pick of the Quarter. And cost me a coupleTaro-4/18/2006
4517VTSS was subject to a thorough audit back in December. If anything the "optTaro-4/18/2006
4516Agree on that one. Crazy Lou had this idea of 6-9 or more for a buy out commandTaro-4/18/2006
4515The reason it does effect the fundamentals of the company is that there is a cleThe Ox-4/18/2006
4514<i>"The company cautioned that it may need to restate past financial Uncle Frank-4/18/2006
4513Was lucky and sold a couple weeks ago. Just picked some up after hours $2.33. FJB-4/18/2006
4512I agree, Dick, but any suitor will need a clean set of books before they can finUncle Frank-4/18/2006
4511I would think that it would increase the likelihood that the company would be soBerk-4/18/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):