SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Bring Back SI Bob!
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
808 25 0
Emcee:  Ilaine Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
458A similar mess on SI a few years ago motivated me to create a fictitious on-linePMS Witch-2/11/2001
457My name is in the phone book. I use my REAL name on SI. My real name was publishJames R. Barrett-2/11/2001
456Members are entitled to choose the identity under which they post messages. TheyJeff-2/11/2001
455Looks like Jeff is on the ball - i just saw that post, hit respond and got 'marcos-2/11/2001
454You know, once I was suspended and I found a way to reduce that sentence...gettiCheeky Kid-2/11/2001
453James, let me give you a far-out ferinstance, and see if you still agree. Are Jon Tara-2/11/2001
452Personally,I think you were wrong posting Cobalt Blue's real name and city oJames R. Barrett-2/11/2001
451It is more than interesting you had to go so far back to post that message.... KLP-2/11/2001
450It all comes down to intent. What was your intent in posting that information? AJon Tara-2/11/2001
449I was on the receiving end and can attest to her viciousness. And I am no CaesarCarolyn-2/11/2001
448Et tu Brute?elmatador-2/11/2001
447O - I am surprised at you! Not good.Carolyn-2/11/2001
446Cobalt Blue is not here as an attorney but as a member. Hence I am not "antelmatador-2/11/2001
445>> I hadn't attacked no one personally here. Most people would regarUncle Frank-2/11/2001
444To show how tough is to separate what is public and what is private. Also to selmatador-2/11/2001
443Objection noted. I'm really sorry if I somehow offended you. Personally, I Don Pueblo-2/11/2001
442Don't react. Think! Go call Peter Edmonston of the Wall Street Journal who welmatador-2/11/2001
441I object to the bone head. I hadn't attacked no one personally here. I had lelmatador-2/11/2001
440I am a member for over 3 years with a clean sheet. Why would you take action agaelmatador-2/11/2001
439We had debates about posting personal and public info before on SI! You are stCheeky Kid-2/11/2001
438I wanted to bring to the debate what is public and what is private. If I bring helmatador-2/11/2001
437THINK! It is a public information published on the Wall Street journal. Februaryelmatador-2/11/2001
436Revealing personal information is ground for termination from SI. Don't youCheeky Kid-2/11/2001
435what a surprise indeed that you find it necessary to take it upon yourself to maRainy_Day_Woman-2/11/2001
434Amen!KLP-2/11/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News