SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc.
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6784 120 0
Emcee:  Tim McGee Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4634The Sell Report: Palm: More Than the Economy Makes Palm Hard to Hold. theinterneJakeStraw-4/5/2001
4633MISERY LOVES COMPANY: 1 lump or 3? Has anyone taken a look to see if any of theCrystal ball-4/4/2001
4632Gambling? Here on Wall St? Shocking. <i>"You must remember this, a lDMaA-4/4/2001
4631ha, LOL !! very good, David!Victor Lazlo-4/4/2001
4630Victor: <i>Down another 9%. ugh....</i> All depends on your point David E. Taylor-4/4/2001
4629Yup? What about it - I believed every word C said and I'M RUINED !! Even myVictor Lazlo-4/4/2001
4628<<PALM $7 ave buy in and getting lower, DOUBLE DOWN and be PATIENT, BUY ANVictor Lazlo-4/4/2001
4627<<So why am I still holding??? (Hoping for a miracle!)>> Hey, even Sawtooth-4/4/2001
4626Dave: <<Problem here is, what's the further downside? Maybe $5? $4? &FNS-4/4/2001
4625FNS: OT: Thanks, I'm looking forward to the break and some quiet family timDavid E. Taylor-4/4/2001
4624David.... OT: re grand kids...Congratulations! You'll soon find out that thFNS-4/4/2001
4623good point David that PALM may be better off without any P/E ratio in terms of psunfish-4/4/2001
4622WLD: OT: Thanks! Actually she was born 5/11/00 and is approaching her first bDavid E. Taylor-4/4/2001
4621<i>to visit my daughter and new (first) granddaughter</i> Now *thatWin-Lose-Draw-4/4/2001
4620<i>PALM isn't the only company in the 500 index whose market cap has sWin-Lose-Draw-4/4/2001
4619Sunfish: Bloomberg should have qualified that report to say that it only applieDavid E. Taylor-4/4/2001
4618Khan: I've noticed before that the quality of posts on SI threads deterioraDavid E. Taylor-4/4/2001
4617WLD: I wondered that too. Since the Nasdaq 100 listing was the most recent addDavid E. Taylor-4/4/2001
4616quote.yahoo.com take a look at the above 5 year chart of SPART US EQ IDX (Nasdaqsunfish-4/4/2001
4615sunfish, There's a good chance that could change soon. :^)JakeStraw-4/4/2001
4614FWIW Bloomberg TV just reported the most highly valued NASDQ stocks, YHOO at PE/sunfish-4/4/2001
4613Victor what happened to - Message 15609985 ?JakeStraw-4/4/2001
4612Mang, <i>the result is a screen that is a bit dimmer than the Palm IIIc olkj-4/4/2001
4611PALM $7 ave buy in and getting lower, DOUBLE DOWN and be PATIENT, BUY AND HOLD, Crystal ball-4/4/2001
4610<<Now Victor, no need for obscenities. PALM is a BUY, IF not now, WHEN? &Victor Lazlo-4/3/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News