SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
GTCI - get in before the news hits
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1541 8 0 GTCI
Emcee:  R. Murray Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
466 Charles, Thats a subscription service I use. I'd be happy to check it foblessed-2/11/1999
465 Blessed - Could you post the URL for the sales info shown. I'd like it so Charles Hogue-2/11/1999
464 Seeing some light profit taking, but more MM manipulation than anything. 11 -blessed-2/11/1999
463 11 - 10:48 V -1.62500 -10,000 11 - 10:48 V -1.68750 -5,000 11 - 10:blessed-2/11/1999
462 A blessed response! Thanks . . ksuave-2/11/1999
461 11 - 09:40 V -1.62500 - 200 11 - 09:40 V -1.56250 -6,000 11 - 09:blessed-2/11/1999
460 In response to the three preceding posts..... First, I don't have an off sztect-2/11/1999
459 I just don't understand -- what's wrong with paid advertisement? It&#pitchlyn-2/11/1999
458 ztect is SNIFFING around to time his SHORTING of GTCI... Big news and rising sFrancois Goelo-2/10/1999
457 ztect, why are you asking all these questions? is it so you can make a reasonedjohn michael winesette-2/10/1999
456 ztect: I won't comment on Yongzhi's review. Those are his observationsTEDennis-2/10/1999
455 Ted... I'm going to defer to you, because and especially after our differeztect-2/10/1999
454 Francois, While the apology wasn't necessary, thank you for being so kind.blessed-2/10/1999
453 I only tested ONE Y2k software -- the one obtained by Bob from GTCI. yongzhi Yongzhi Yang-2/10/1999
452 Francois, Thanks. You don't have to apologize. It's normal to have dYongzhi Yang-2/10/1999
451 Francois: There seems to be some miscommunication somewhere ... In the post thTEDennis-2/10/1999
450 REF: ztect. I owe an apology to the thread for having... attracted his attentiFrancois Goelo-2/10/1999
449 Hey Jay lock & load...Both barrels!! Saw it off if necessary!! Bob Biersack-2/10/1999
448 Jem, I suppose the company was attempting to mislead someone by announcing thiblessed-2/10/1999
447 I have yet to know any PR firm that doesn't work for compensation. For smaJay Hardy-2/10/1999
446 Oh man...........................<i>promises promises.........</i> BishopsChild-2/10/1999
445 No probs, but you're the third person today to come on this thread and poinksuave-2/10/1999
444 What is your problem? I thought I asked a civil question in a civil manner andSPSEIFERT-2/10/1999
443 My point is that your message did not identify the authors. SPSEIFERT-2/10/1999
442 Jemuel..Thanks for the heads up..Read back 200 posts... You call that "ddztect-2/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):