SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4680Well, as you do not seem prepared to deal with my actual misgivings, it is not wNeocon-2/20/2003
4679Actually, I believe they are pressing the UK to make a comparable statute.....Neocon-2/20/2003
4678yesaverage joe-2/20/2003
4677<i>I am pretty sure that what was the patient's option will eventuallyLane3-2/20/2003
4676Should this woman be in jail? washingtonpost.comThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4675You're getting pretty far from the example, IMO. What you are saying is thThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4674<i> That's not dismissing their POV, it's saying I have a right toLane3-2/20/2003
4673Which almost makes it worse. Yes, you can kill yourself, but we prohibit anybodThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4672There has to be concurrent illegality for most crimes. But they are proposing eThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4671<i>Seems to me that it's un-neighborly and arrogant to dismiss thThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4670You should finish reading a post before responding to it. I said nothing about pNeocon-2/20/2003
4669I wasn't suggesting it was equivalent to Arena football. I was saying itThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4668<i>I do, in fact, criticize those who would check out upon finding they arThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4667<b>Britain has negotiated a deal under which the offences will only apply Neocon-2/20/2003
4666No that is what is so shocking. It isn't illegal to say something hateful icosmicforce-2/20/2003
4665I thought the article said that there had to be "concurrent illegality"Neocon-2/20/2003
4664I wasn't implying that the warrant would be issued here, but could be if I wcosmicforce-2/20/2003
4663<i>You fail, I think, to identify the difference between "dismissing Lane3-2/20/2003
4662<I>"That's precisely what war is,..."</i> I don'tone_less-2/20/2003
4661An American would, it appears, not be covered by the EU warrant......Neocon-2/20/2003
4660Actually, it was my point all along. I was merely pondering the weight of your aNeocon-2/20/2003
4659I do not think our assertions on the matter are mutually exclusive.....Neocon-2/20/2003
4658I do, in fact, criticize those who would check out upon finding they are terminaNeocon-2/20/2003
4657<i>n the end, it is society who decides what is "good" for itselThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4656<i>"I'm surprised to find you even suggesting that it is good forSolon-2/20/2003
4655Whether it should or shouldn't be about that, it is. That's precisely wThe Philosopher-2/19/2003
4654The point I have tried to make on several occasions is that a war should not be one_less-2/19/2003
4653You fail, I think, to identify the difference between "dismissing the POV&qThe Philosopher-2/19/2003
4652You forgot to add the "to the President." That's an important parThe Philosopher-2/19/2003
4651<i>Boxing has given pride and meaning and livelihood to thousands on The Philosopher-2/19/2003
4650You are stretching so far it's absurd. The World Court has no history at alThe Philosopher-2/19/2003
4649Nope. Not if inconsistent.The Philosopher-2/19/2003
4648Thanks for posting that article. It was too long by at least half, but I think Lane3-2/19/2003
4647<I> What is likely and what is wise, should be the same thing. </i>TimF-2/19/2003
4646OK so you meant its arrogant to dismiss the POV of others or more specifically iTimF-2/19/2003
4645<i>I wish there was not bolstering and bandwagoning (by the govt and by opLane3-2/19/2003
4644I was not thinking in relative terms. If there were a conflict he would have to one_less-2/19/2003
4643<i>I still consider it likely.</i> Well, since we're going to dLane3-2/19/2003
4642And you're comfortable with that kind of relativism? Wow! I'd never thcosmicforce-2/19/2003
4641What is likely and what is wise, should be the same thing.cosmicforce-2/19/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News