SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4720No, I'm not saying that the slippery slope is valid. I think it's too oThe Philosopher-2/21/2003
4719<i>But we are perceiving that the bad boy is also harming us, either immedLane3-2/21/2003
4718If I had a bully riding my ass for months, and I was finally in a position to wrNeocon-2/21/2003
4717Yes, there is a difference, and one which I am prepared to honor in many circumsNeocon-2/21/2003
4716<i> This is not a lot different from my reluctance to just storm in and taTimF-2/21/2003
4715I think there is a difference between approving of something and refusing to punThe Philosopher-2/21/2003
4714<i>Your notion of "inflicting pain" is a childish one.</i>The Philosopher-2/21/2003
4713Its not about who lives or who dies as a way to keep score. It is about who wiTimF-2/21/2003
4712So what you are saying is that the slippery slope is valid, but not necessarily Neocon-2/21/2003
4711Yes, I didn't respond to your analogy, because I found it preposterous. KillNeocon-2/21/2003
4710Blix, Chirac, and Schroeder are trying to effect regime change in London and WasTom Clarke-2/21/2003
4709Kagan has expanded on that article and written a book. He's basically sayingTom Clarke-2/21/2003
4708<i>"I don't see it necessarily as a bad thing to not agree with aSolon-2/21/2003
4707He said that he is afraid of becoming the focus of attention so he did not reporone_less-2/21/2003
4706I think abortion is one,. as has been pointed out. What I know best is the law,The Philosopher-2/20/2003
4705You didn't respond to my analogy that saying you have the right to check outThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4704But we are perceiving that the bad boy is also harming us, either immediately orThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4703I trust that your friend wrote down the number and reported it. One phone call Lane3-2/20/2003
4702I just got off the phone with an Arab American friend of mine named Mohammed. Heone_less-2/20/2003
4701I have to go. Have a good evening, all.....Neocon-2/20/2003
4700Name some cases where a slippery slope was claimed, that turned out to be a pendNeocon-2/20/2003
4699Again, if they want to check out, fine. That is their business, and if they are Neocon-2/20/2003
4698<i>Where is the principle by which I can decide, under your principles, whLane3-2/20/2003
4697I like that analogy. And it is really quite true in almost all cases.The Philosopher-2/20/2003
4696Well, then, it's hard for me to determine when you think I am obligated to sThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4695Hmmm. I wouldn't say that leglislative enactments and court decisions "The Philosopher-2/20/2003
4694The trend in the law is all I am interested in.....Neocon-2/20/2003
4693I was about to edit my post to Neo when I got sidetracked by my inbox. VirginiaLane3-2/20/2003
4692I will give you half a loaf......Neocon-2/20/2003
4691<i>So will you amend your list to include that option? </i> No, my Lane3-2/20/2003
4690You'd be really hard pressed to show that as a percentage, 2nd term abortioncosmicforce-2/20/2003
4689In fact, I think the Roe v. Wade slippery slope has been decidedly unslippery. The Philosopher-2/20/2003
4688Legislative enactments and court decisions are not only a matter of adjudicatingNeocon-2/20/2003
4687Well, I think what I said was a fair interpretation of what you suggested. You The Philosopher-2/20/2003
4686You're right, the line of the law has retreated, in practice. I had in mindLane3-2/20/2003
4685I don't understand them well enough to deal with them. Which is why I askedThe Philosopher-2/20/2003
4684No, the moderate position of Roe v. Wade, which merely liberalized first trimestNeocon-2/20/2003
4683It has? I thought it played out pretty much as intended, a few excesses here anLane3-2/20/2003
4682<i>If we take your position, an informal community POV becomes a controlliLane3-2/20/2003
4681All that was expected of the abortion "slippery slope" has come to pasNeocon-2/20/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):