SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FASTCOMM (FSCX)...UP, UP, & AWAY!!!
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
173 1 0 FSCX
Emcee:  starpopper Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
48 Michael Patrick: Are you lurking? I have been impressed with your knowledge in Rick Smith-3/5/1998
47 If this is such good news, why is the stock trading below 3 again? I don'tRanchokid-3/3/1998
46 GTE and FastComm Renew Multi-Year Purchase Agreement =======================Alan Aronoff-3/3/1998
45 Was there a press release?Craig Kaltner-3/3/1998
44 GTE Renews Pact to Buy FSCX Frame Relay Access Devices For Three Years Wow, whaRick Smith-3/3/1998
43 Market seems not to like this marriage.Anyway, maybe was reacting to the bad rescope-3/2/1998
42kgdata.com Couldn't find much about the company besides its product line.Alan Aronoff-3/2/1998
41 This announcement prompts a lot of questions. Price? Structure? What are KG'Bill-3/2/1998
40 Biil: I think it would have been more odd if we knew! <G> I wonder what&#Rick Smith-3/2/1998
39 How odd, no mention of price.Bill-3/2/1998
38 STERLING, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 2, 1998-- Cements Leadership Position iAlan Aronoff-3/2/1998
37 I guess this will hit the tape in a little while, so I won't type the entirRick Smith-3/2/1998
36 The reason for the additional shares becomes clearer! I'm not sure I'm Rick Smith-3/2/1998
35 Good for you James.scope-2/27/1998
34 Proposals will give the Board of Directors the express authority,without furthescope-2/27/1998
33 II and III are related to the shareholders meeting. I think II is an issue of James Murray-2/27/1998
32 What is Proposal II and III; and why vote no?Ranchokid-2/27/1998
31 I continue to like the trading activity with FSCX. It has built up some solid sAlan Aronoff-2/27/1998
30 To All: Make yourself a favor. Vote NO on Proposal II, and III.scope-2/27/1998
29 Thanks. That appears to clear it up for me. I plead guilty of excessive skepticBill-2/26/1998
28 News Release: Different from the one we saw yesterday. Looks like they are tryiRick Smith-2/26/1998
27 Exactly my point. It's never anyone's "intention" to give awaBill-2/26/1998
26 Re: The $500k in shipments could sit in a warehouse for the next 12 months, foMark Ableson-2/26/1998
25 Firm Orders Should Materialize Soon! Bill, I would be surprised if additionalThomas Kirwin-2/26/1998
24 It's a guaranteed order, but that's not my point. Restocking supply chaBill-2/26/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News