SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AremisSoft Corporation (AREM)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
683 15 0 AREM
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
483As to why the AREM strategy has not been done by other firms in a similar positiBen Wa-7/1/2001
482No. Your hypothetical is wrong. Once the broker for Mr. A, the true owner, lendscgw1948-7/1/2001
481I'm sorry to be so thick; I still don't understand. Let's say I'Seeker of Truth-7/1/2001
480That's precisely the point, Malcolm. The Company is requiring a PHYSICAL SURcgw1948-7/1/2001
479Well at least that would be a sane outcome of the recapitalization, albeit one tKevin Podsiadlik-7/1/2001
478I have posted several times on various boards, without getting any response, theSeeker of Truth-7/1/2001
477<i>I agree it's sad when one of your quiet little holdings turns into Dale Baker-7/1/2001
476Every day that the lackeys and fools take this stock up another notch, is anotheMr. Pink-7/1/2001
475Every day that the lackeys and fools take this stock up another notch, is anotheMr. Pink-7/1/2001
474I am glad you clarified for the "record," Kevin, that you are not shorcgw1948-6/30/2001
473<I>ZIXI wouldn't do this because the charges against them can be easilKevin Podsiadlik-6/30/2001
472Let me ask this, just so there is no confusion. Do you agree or disagree with tKevin Podsiadlik-6/30/2001
471Kevin, if your argument is valid, then every new idea would be doomed to failureRichard James-6/30/2001
470I guess that's proof by assertion. Whatever. As Dale says, only time will Kevin Podsiadlik-6/30/2001
469<i>(Dale: What if ZIXI did this?)</i> Here is a total non sequitur Dale Baker-6/30/2001
468It really is just that simple, Kevin. And the longer the shorts stay in the denicgw1948-6/30/2001
467I think the positives outweigh the negatives on this stock. First about the shoSeeker of Truth-6/30/2001
466<I>The shorts will have three choices in the coming weeks: l) cover at theKevin Podsiadlik-6/30/2001
465Kevin, The issue is not whether Herb was "blowing smoke" when he saicgw1948-6/29/2001
464Sold my position at $16.80. Thanks for the tidy profits, Little Pig! Bye for nowMichael T Currie-6/28/2001
463<b>ARE U PREPARED FOR UNLIMITED LOSSES? SHORTS WILL BLEED!!afrayem onigwecher-6/28/2001
462Good call and I take 17+. Know any die hard shorts who wants my insurance policybenchpress550-6/28/2001
461Wow - over 17. Lot faster than I thought. Guess you have to hop on BrownFingerrrufff-6/28/2001
460<i> ok stupid eff, time for Securities 101 (read you really don't knowbenchpress550-6/28/2001
459<b>Boy, it has been great making a lot of money trading this stock on upafrayem onigwecher-6/27/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News