SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Shiva
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5036 13 0 SHVA
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4836 Great point RRuff !! Are you listening out there SWIB ??? RE-PRICED Options...YJR2-11/27/1998
4835 Personally, given the history and the apparent conflicts of interest, the only rrufff-11/25/1998
4834 Chris B : Mark's correct answer includes the fact that even if you sell youJR2-11/25/1998
4833 Berman, DeValerio & Pease LLP Announces That An Additional Class Action Lawbob zagorin-11/25/1998
4832 <b>Shiva Corporation Receives Government Approval For Global, Multi-IndusArtslaw-11/25/1998
4831 Bob - plse. read your own post <... filed ... on May 21, 1997> ! :) CJ-11/25/1998
4830 Thanks Bruce. SHVA sure tried to make it seem like this was an INTC related suibob zagorin-11/25/1998
4829 Bob, The Class Action Lawsuit being dismissed was initiated long before the CoBruce Wilhite-11/25/1998
4828 That is some justus these F*** Federal judges render.I wonder how much the judGabor-11/25/1998
4827 <dismissed the purported class action claim> At first glance, I would nCJ-11/25/1998
4826 Very funny.Have a great holiday. Regards GaborGabor-11/25/1998
4825 A funny thought came to mind. When men hunt with hawks it is called falconry. WMark A. Forte-11/25/1998
4824 Lirette v. Shiva Corporation Class Action Claim Dismissed BEDFORD, Mass., Nov.bob zagorin-11/24/1998
4823 This is just a start.When all said and done it will be 1000ds.This could even Gabor-11/24/1998
4822 Just a follow up note to my two earlier posts: over 100 people have joined the Curtis Van Carter-11/24/1998
4821 Leave that to the parasitic lawyers.They will think of that you can be sure ofGabor-11/24/1998
4820 We need to figure out a way to sue Intel. That's where the deep pockets areMark A. Forte-11/24/1998
4819 Thanks for the very nice work.It sure looks that way,althogh I am not surpriseGabor-11/24/1998
4818 One other thing I would like to add to my previous message: Shiva was evidentlyCurtis Van Carter-11/24/1998
4817 BDPLAW E-mail Address(es): bdplaw@bermanesq.com This is the law firm which seCurtis Van Carter-11/24/1998
4816 This is a class action lawsuit. If you had your shares before a certain date yoMark A. Forte-11/24/1998
4815 Sorry if this is a question that has been asked before, but do current shareholChris B-11/24/1998
4814 You Z, As ALWAYS...seem to say EXACTLY what I am thinking...yet so much more suJR2-11/23/1998
4813 You can still participate in the class action even if you sold your shares. &qdaaan-11/21/1998
4812 Bob, I'm not a shareholder anymore (sold off after intel announced the buyShivram Hala-11/20/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):