SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
uniView Technologies - UVEW
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6895 7 0 UVEW
Emcee:  emichael Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5045 Re: Reverse split As Joe and others have mentioned, a reverse split would be dBulgar-8/21/1997
5044 Who knows, maybe someday, Curtis Mathes will have a newsletter going out to allJoe Barker-8/21/1997
5043 Jon, you were abosolutely right. But then I also didn't contemplate that CMLenny W.-8/21/1997
5042 With such rigorous logic as yours, I bet you'd invest in a perpetual motionIKM-8/21/1997
5041 Lenny, if you go back a few hundred or a few thousand posts, I warned about 50-Jon Tara-8/21/1997
5040 Joe, Infomercials not mentioned as a selling source in their filing. Did mentioLenny W.-8/21/1997
5039 If a reverse stock split brings it back above $5, it could then be shortable - IKM-8/21/1997
5038 That's right Jim. We would all <b><i>lose</b></i> Joe Barker-8/21/1997
5037 Joe: I understand that the talk is of a 10:1 reverse stock split. The <b>Jim Gary-8/21/1997
5036 Carl, it was only a few months ago that Custer said during his CC that "reJoe Barker-8/21/1997
5035 Lenny, I highly question if the TV ads will indeed start in September. My guesJoe Barker-8/21/1997
5034 Hey, what happen to your last post:>) (This is my response for those lost wJoe Barker-8/21/1997
5033 Maybe a reverse split would enable you to bleed to death more smoothly. As it IKM-8/21/1997
5032 Joe, on another issue. Neal keeps saying that national tv advertising will begiLenny W.-8/21/1997
5031 Jim, we are talking about a 10:1 "reverse" stock split. That means tJoe Barker-8/21/1997
5030 Lenny: Here we are drowning in a sea of dilution. The final blow would be a 1 fJim Gary-8/21/1997
5029 Lenny, a reverse stock split was an option that was mentioned by Custer last yeJoe Barker-8/21/1997
5028 Sure that would be real positive.....like Custer hearing that another 1000 IndiCarl Jackson-8/21/1997
5027 Anyone: Could CM be looking for a 5:1 or 10:1 Reverse Stock Split in the near fLenny W.-8/21/1997
5026 Sounds like CRTM management are packing their 'chutes. With all of the admPeter Fiala-8/21/1997
5025 Been a lurker on this thread from time to time. One thing I noticed is that thEric Maggard-8/21/1997
5024 Remember the song "I Can See Clearly Now". 52 mil today, 80 mil not fLenny W.-8/21/1997
5023 My question is the same. Is this the remainder of their 10 mil "credit linJon Scott-8/21/1997
5022 at least we know where the fu..ing selling pressure is coming from, will it evemrvn t. martian-8/21/1997
5021 Jon, please give us a overview of what took place on the money part of this repJoe Barker-8/21/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News