SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
512The complacency indexes don't give any clues on the future of SI, Bob, and tTechTrader42-2/15/2002
511OT: being the last person on planet earth to hear that Infospace is in trouble, bob wallace-2/15/2002
510T'ain't work, Sherman. If it were work, I'd quit doing it. It basicaTechTrader42-2/15/2002
509Thanks Brook, the CI's are right on again. Unfortunately I was working awaySherman Chen-2/15/2002
508Here are the latest numbers. ST Naz CI: 79.303 99.155 MT Naz CI: 79.303 99.155TechTrader42-2/15/2002
507Brookelise, Thanks for the CI's and commentary. FWIW, I think the most imWilliam JH-2/15/2002
506Well, I've been unsubscribed, for being insufficiently deferential toward thTechTrader42-2/14/2002
505ST Naz CI: 100.000 81.223 MT Naz CI: 100.000 81.223 LT Naz CI: 100.000 96.514 STechTrader42-2/14/2002
504Public service announcement: Before the close: ST Naz CI: 94.720 81.223 MT NazTechTrader42-2/14/2002
503well, I have to admit that I was a doubter, but evidently I was well within the bob wallace-2/14/2002
502Latest indexes this morning: ST Naz CI: 94.432 81.223 MT Naz CI: 94.432 81.223 TechTrader42-2/14/2002
501I confess that the CI's have always been the Cleo Indexes. The secret is outTechTrader42-2/14/2002
500From reading the notes on SI, I gather that a lot of people know the results in TechTrader42-2/14/2002
499LOL .. Good grief .. Well Missy, that explains the phone bill you've rackeTriffin-2/14/2002
498Yes, but there are legal problems already: sunsentinal.comTechTrader42-2/14/2002
497well, whenever I make a diretion comment on market action, it goes and does the bob wallace-2/14/2002
496<i>I've finally developed a system that gives me exact closing prices Triffin-2/14/2002
495I know what the day will bring, Bob, because I've finally developed a systemTechTrader42-2/14/2002
494well, I certainly don't know what the day will bring, but it has been a realbob wallace-2/14/2002
493ST Naz CI: 77.948 67.249 MT Naz CI: 77.948 67.249 LT Naz CI: 95.906 93.920 ST STechTrader42-2/13/2002
492Anonymous gamblers and trade rate afficionados: ST Naz CI: 74.127 67.249 MT NazTechTrader42-2/13/2002
491ST Naz CI: 67.249 56.769 MT Naz CI: 67.249 56.769 LT Naz CI: 93.920 91.974 ST STechTrader42-2/12/2002
490ST Naz CI: 61.354 56.769 MT Naz CI: 61.354 56.769 LT Naz CI: 92.825 91.974 ST STechTrader42-2/12/2002
489Intraday: ST Naz CI: 46.725, 56.769 MT Naz CI: 46.725, 56.769 LT Naz CI: 90.109TechTrader42-2/12/2002
488Excellent, the CI's have been right on lately. Seems like things should be Sherman Chen-2/11/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News